1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Sergeeva-Olga [200]
3 years ago
7

Compare the race relations and human rights issues during Reconstruction with the Civil Rights movement of the 1950s and 60s. In

what ways are they similar? How are they different? What do these similarities and differences say about the successes and failures of Reconstruction?
History
1 answer:
kirill [66]3 years ago
7 0

I) The Reconstruction Era and the 1950s and 60s weren't as different as they should be. With different degrees, racism and segregation persisted in XXth century America. African-Americans still couldn't fully exercise their rights as the whites did theirs, and they still suffered violence from white supremacists and authorities.

II) The differences rest in how African-Americans in the 50s and 60s were better mobilized and prepared to defend themselves and fight for their rights. Despite continuous racism, in the 50s and 60s there was more space and sources from which racism could be fought against. There was NAACP, for example, and many public figures famous for fighting racism.

III) From this comparison, we see that one of the Reconstruction's successes was the foundation for legal disputes in favor of African-Americans rights, like the 14th Amendment and the 15th Amendment that provided the legal basis to fight racism and to expand African-americans rights. As for Reconstruction's failures, it didn't dismantle racist structures in the South and didn't succeed in changing culturally how black people were seen, leaving space for racism in its many forms like lynchings and segregation.

You might be interested in
Ethnic and cultural divisions between peoples were used by colonial powers to maintain control of their colonies.
Viktor [21]
This is correct.
This strategy was called "divide and rule" and was used for example in India where the British were strengthening tensions between the Muslims and the Hindus - the result of this is still visible in the conflict between India and Pakistan.
5 0
4 years ago
Panu bonotin ang bulbul​
Arlecino [84]

Answer:

ching cho

Explanation:

                                                               

5 0
3 years ago
What describes the main source of success for the Minoan civilization
Blizzard [7]
<span> abundant resources and trade with distant lands</span>
3 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Which Amendment has been violated?
EastWind [94]

The third amendment, which prevents quartering, has been violated.

7 0
3 years ago
Which of the following is not true of the Vikings?
34kurt

Answer:

D)  By the 12th century, they had ceased their raids and begun to blend with European people’s.

Explanation:

3 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • Where did the Huns not invade?
    11·2 answers
  • How did the Magna Carta influence future governments? Choose four correct answers.
    10·1 answer
  • Locke's two treatises of government, rousseau's the social contract, and montesquieu's the spirit of the laws were works written
    9·1 answer
  • What was one major difference between King Louis XVI and Napoleon Bonaparte
    14·2 answers
  • Television in the 1960s was “a place to _____________ too”
    8·1 answer
  • Giving 99 points! Please help!!!!!
    8·1 answer
  • H. heidelbergensis __________.
    6·1 answer
  • What statement about the industrial revolution and capitalism is true?
    13·1 answer
  • What occupation did Muhammad have before the first revelation?
    13·2 answers
  • Would someone mind helping me? I really need this answer but I'm so confused. I would appreciate any help :) and if you get the
    15·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!