Answer:
the answer is A:imply the resolution of the story
Explanation:
Answer:
Akbar was secular and Aurangzeb was not secular
Explanation:
Akbar was secular and he allowed people of all religion to practice their religious rituals without any fear in his reign. This was evident from the Akbar decision to allow his Hindu wife Jodha to continue being Hindu.
While on the other hand Aurangzeb was not secular and he forcefully converted people of other religion to adopt Islam forcefully
Any choices???......................
The Whig theory, put into place after the Glorious Revolution, put a premium on the idea of civic virtue, placing the public good above personal interest. To promote such virtue, one needed a society in which property ownership was widespread. An agricultural nation, where farming was thought to encourage honesty, frugality, and independence, was less likely to become corrupt than a society dependent on commerce and manufacturing. In an agrarian society, politics would be less fractious because everyone's interest would be similar. In such a society representatives would be less fractious because everyone's interest would be similar. In such a society representatives would be equally affected by whatever laws they passed. This would prevent them from tyrannizing over the people by passing oppressive laws.
<span>The Whig view of politics was not democratic. It assumed that only men who owned property had a sufficient permanent stake in society to be trusted to vote.</span>
