Answer:
Generally, advertisements made to the public in relation to the sale of a vehicle or any other merchandise at a specified price are not considered as offers for a binding contract by the courts. Instead, they are generally considered to be invitations to treat or for the public to make a deal. This implies that John's agreement to buy the Wagon R at the quoted price is an offer to Peter, which he is free to accept or reject.
The use of checks (cheques) is a valid means of exchange and is recognized by the courts in payment of the consideration in a contract.
Explanation:
The law of contract requires that there must be a mutual agreement (represented by an offer and acceptance), mutual assent (the legal intention to create a contract), and consideration (the price for the exchange). Since Peter and John did not move beyond the offer stage, there is no legally binding contract or agreement between them. Peter is free to reject John's offer to buy the Wagon R.
Human rights include the right to life and liberty, freedom from slavery and torture, freedom of opinion and expression, the right to work and education, and many more. Everyone is entitled to these rights, without discrimination.
Answer:
Our rights Come from our birth-not government. We get all of our rights from birth. Those rights cannot be taken away; they are inalienable, and they belong to each individual, not to a group or category of individuals, but to each person.
I would say possible. That is the best answer.
