A.
Some conditions that might have led Samuel's decision to commit a crime could've been students picking him, making fun of him, bullying him. Anything that had to do with other students acting negative to Samuel is what I think is the reason Samuel made this decision.
B.
There's a bunch of things that could've been done to help Samuel. Such as discussing the issue to his parents or sibling, telling the principal what the problem was, etc. Samuel would just need someone to talk to about what was going on, this would probably help him. <em>"Were there signs at school or home that he was at risk? </em><em>I don't understand what this means sorry.</em>
C.
There are barely any at my previous school that I used to attend. Some additional measures that would need to be added would be weapon, drug, etc., detected doors, staff members checking students' bags, etc.
Hazirah can legally claim the remaining balance of Intan's debt because there was no acceptance of the offer from Johan that the part-payment should serve as full settlement.
<h3>What is the law of contract?</h3>
The law of contract deals with the enforcement of promises when certain elements are present. These contract elements include offer, acceptance, consideration, and intention.
Intan should remember that a valid and enforceable contract has conditions. We cannot claim there is an implied acceptance of Johan's offer. Johan cannot modify the contract terms between Intan and Hazirah because he was not a party to the contract.
Lastly, Johan did not offer any consideration for Hazirah to forfeit the balance of RM5,000. And Hazirah remained silent during Johan's informal negotiations without communicating her acceptance.
Thus, there was <u>no </u><u>contract</u><u> </u>between Johan and Hazirah, and Intan should do well to repay the balance.
Learn more about the elements of a contract at brainly.com/question/8116487
Answer: Rule; Issue; Analysis
Explanation:
Legal reasoning refers to a method of thought whereby legal rules are applied to specific interactions.
When the facts are compared to the rule, an analysis of the case can be developed. From this analysis, a (rule) can be made as to whether or not the (issue) applies to the (analysis).
No Ineedhelpmefkskxmscmdmxmdwmfkkckdvkkcncnccncnnvnv
According to John F. Gallinero, legal definitions of criminality are arrived through a political process.
