Answer:
Yes, because making agreements with foreign nations is a concurrent power
Explanation:
The state of Texas wished to make an agreement with the foreign government of Mexico.
Is this allowed by the Constitution?
The answer:
Yes, because making agreements with foreign nations is a concurrent power.
A state can make an agreement with a foreign government by special permission from Congress or the Constitution as it is a concurrent power.
Answer:
Constitutional interpretations of federalism (article)
Explanation:
might have the answer
Answer:
1. One of its goals is to encourage other countries to make their governments more democratic.
2. The department of State.
3. Congress
Explanation:
1. this is because the more democratic country is in the county's best interest in terms of national defense.
2.
The Department of State plays the lead role in developing and implementing the President’s foreign policy. Major responsibilities include United States representation abroad, foreign assistance, foreign military training programs, countering international crime, and a wide assortment of services to U.S. citizens and foreign nationals seeking entrance to the U.S.
The U.S. maintains diplomatic relations with approximately 180 countries — each posted by civilian U.S. Foreign Service employees — as well as with international organizations. At home, more than 5,000 civil employees carry out the mission of the Department.
The Secretary of State serves as the President’s top foreign policy adviser, and oversees 30,000 employees and a budget of approximately $35 billion.
3.
The Constitution grants Congress the sole power to declare war. Congress has declared war on 11 occasions, including its first declaration of war with Great Britain in 1812. Congress approved its last formal declaration of war during World War II.
Answer:
The Tea Act of 1773 was one of several measures imposed on the American colonists by the heavily indebted British government in the decade leading up to the American Revolutionary War (1775-83). The act’s main purpose was not to raise revenue from the colonies but to bail out the floundering East India Company, a key actor in the British economy. The British government granted the company a monopoly on the importation and sale of tea in the colonies. The colonists had never accepted the constitutionality of the duty on tea, and the Tea Act rekindled their opposition to it.
Explanation:
