Answer:
I mean debate can encourage new laws but if you have one side wishing for laws and the other against it. It will usually slow legislation which is entirely the purpose. But it depends on what view are you taking it from because th end result can be no legislation at all or even a relaxation of legislation in fact that's happened in some states. So it depends on the view and narrative you wish to push. because it can be a semblance of all but B. If you're a centrist you'd probably say this debate will encourage new laws but the whole point of not wishing for infringements upon one's rights means no new laws. If you wanted new laws then this debate is a waste of time but you're angering a large portion of the population because you seek not to listen to the statistics and thereby information one may have that may dissuade from the legislation. And if you look at D it can be so. If 2 cannot agree then rights will not be infringed upon. Unless the side with more representatives that disagrees with the right then such laws will be enacted. Yes, they can place new restrictions and there you can make the case it's unconstitutional and etc because well there is ground and a foundation laid upon there. But as far as an actual thing it'd be A I suppose. But I'd question the teacher because it depends on how one views a division. It can be either cooperative relationships that can be mended or an all or nothing if it's not my way then we will have conflict and it shall erupt. It all depends.
Explanation:
Answer: a stretch of muddy land left uncovered at low tide.
Explanation:
ealizes rycerskość (Code of Chivalry - bohaterowie-rycerze przestrzegający tego kodu) Idealizuje szlachetnego rycerza-bohatera i jego śmiałe uczynki. Kobiety są wyidealizowane i cenione przez rycerza-bohatera.
It would be "Robertson," who was not a European religious reformer, at least not on the same level as Luther and Calvin, since these two ushered in eras of massive reform.
Answer:
The British presence in India did cause a negative impact, but it also had positive consequences.
Explanation:
To start, the British unified the country, which can be seen as a negative to many people, but also as a positive for many others. India is one of the largest countries in the world, the second most populated, and this gives it a geopolitical standing that it would otherwise not have.
The British also built the extensive rail network that crosses most of India, and that is an essential part of Indian economy and society.
Finally, the British developed many political and legal institutions. Indian Law is an offshoot of British common law for example.
