Spain. Jefferson had bought Louisiana from France. Beyond the western borders of the Louisiana was territory owned by Spain.
Answer:
I believe your answer is most likely A or D, if not then C. (I hope it helps!!)
Explanation:
<u>A </u><u>stimulus</u><u> that has been repeatedly associated with the preparation for, anticipation of, or the actual use of alcohol/drugs is </u><u> dopamine and serotonin.</u>
Which neurotransmitter is responsible for schizophrenia?
- According to research, a change in the levels of the neurotransmitters serotonin and dopamine may be the root of schizophrenia.
- According to some studies, an imbalance between the two may be the root of the issue.
- Others have discovered that schizophrenia is partially caused by a change in the body's sensitivity to the neurotransmitters.
What function does dopamine serve in schizophrenia?
- Dopamine is crucial in the management of schizophrenia. Antipsychotic medications are used to treat the positive symptoms of schizophrenia by inhibiting dopamine activity.
- However, side effects are frequently reported by antipsychotic drug users.
Learn more about schizophrenia
brainly.com/question/23035586
#SPJ4
Hi! Not going to write your assignment for you but happy to give you some thoughts for it.
1. Urbanization: One of the key consequences of the Industrial Revolution was a move towards urban centers as putting factories in urban areas helped keep costs down
2. Loss of worker identity: With the rise of technology, workers because less needed and more like cogs in a machine
3. Women in the workplace: Many mills started to hire women, too, as they had skill with fabric based work. See: Lowell Mills.
Answer:
Explanation:
Issue: Can an institution of higher learning use race as a factor when making admissions decisions?
Result: The Court held that universities may use race as part of an admissions process so long as "fixed quotas" are not used. The Court determined that the specific system in place at the University of California Medical School was "unnecessary" to achieve the goal of creating a diverse student body and was merely a "fixed quota" and therefore, was unconstitutional.
Importance: The decision started a line of cases in which the Court upheld affirmative action programs. In 2003, such academic affirmative action programs were again directly challenged in Gratz v. Bollinger and Grutter v. Bollinger. In these cases, the Court clarified that admission programs that include race as a factor can pass constitutional muster so long as the policy is narrowly tailored and does not create an automatic preference based on race. The Court asserted that a system that created an automatic race-based preference would in fact violate the Equal Protection Clause.
