70,000+9,000+30+1
Seventy thousand nine hundred thirty one
Answer:
B) -3/2
Step-by-step explanation:
If [x/2]=0 then x/2 is a number such that the least integer greater than or equal to x/2 is 0. We can rewrite this as the inequality x/2≤0. Then, the value of x in C, D and E is wrong because they are positive numbers, then x/2 would be a positive number which contradicts this inequality.
Now, 0 is the least integer that satisfies this inequality, therefore we cannot have that x/2≤-1 since -1 is an integer and -1<0. Then x/2>-1. This discards A as wrong, because for x=-2, x/2=-1, contrary to x/2>-1.
Thus B is the right answer. To verify, if x=-3/2, then x/2=-3/4 and we have that -1<-3/4≤0 as required.
Answer:
Kevin is 6
Step-by-step explanation:
Let k represent Kevin's age now. Then Brendon's age now is (k-3). Two years ago the relationship of their ages was ...
k-2 = 4((k-3) -2)
k -2 = 4k -20 . . . . . eliminate parentheses, collect terms
3k = 18 . . . . . . . . . . add 20-k
k = 6 . . . . . . . . . . . . divide by 3
Kevin is 6 now.
The preimage was shifted to the image by a translation 2 units right and 2 units up, so the answer is 
Answer:
use fraction caculator
Step-by-step explanation:
srry for wrong answer just need points for this question ineed only one more answer for so again i am so srry pls dont get amd or just dont pay any attention to this
