1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Maurinko [17]
3 years ago
14

How did Europeans get slaves in the 1800s?

Social Studies
1 answer:
kolbaska11 [484]3 years ago
3 0

Answer:

Europeans bought enslaved people who were captured by other Africans

You might be interested in
Why did Spanish in New Spain need a new work force and who were they?
mamaluj [8]

Answer:

They had originally used the natives to do their laborious work but do to disease, and harsh working conditions the majority of them died. They needed a new cheap labor force and that's when the Spanish began to use <u>African</u> slaves.

8 0
3 years ago
How has the discovery of oil in some Southwest Asian countries affected the economic development of this area?
OlgaM077 [116]

Answer:

i would go with B

Explanation:

6 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
In which zone was Berlin located?
astraxan [27]
Germany is the zone where Berlin is located.
3 0
3 years ago
Juan is a fearless 4-year-old and one of the most active children in his day care center. He eagerly climbs the playground equip
timama [110]

Answer:

Juan should be told the rules and regulations, so it can guide her.

Explanation:

She will note that if she specifies the rules and explanations for her concerns, Juan will have a greater chance of complying. Juan is still 4 years old and at that stage of development, children needs to be thought by giving them instructions because they learn better through proper guidance and instructions.

Juan should be told what is right or wrong to do, and be guided appropriately well.

7 0
3 years ago
What would have happened if prithviraj killed ghori in the first battle of terrain explain by describing the reasons of the vict
maks197457 [2]

Answer:

If prithviraj had killed ghori in the first battle, there would be no need for a second battle where prithviraj would be defeated.

Explanation:

Although Prithviraj emerged victorious in the first battle, he proved to be an extremely arrogant and superb character, allowing Ghori to stay alive, even though he knew it could have dire consequences. This decision by Prithviraj was senseless and caused the need for a second battle where he was defeated, also because of his arrogance, allowing Ghori to continue his plans.

8 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • Why were democrats angry after the president election of 1876?
    9·1 answer
  • Which battle marked the first military clash in the American Revolution?
    15·2 answers
  • HELP PLEASEEEE
    13·2 answers
  • What areas did the Aztec Empire include?
    13·1 answer
  • On an international level, which of these would be recognized as a 'state'?
    7·1 answer
  • In your opinion, was the American Revolution Justified? Are you a patriot (yes), loyalist (no) or neutral (maybe)
    10·1 answer
  • Public advocacy organizations
    7·1 answer
  • What happened to the referee at the green bay game
    8·1 answer
  • the cta may contain a generalized monitoring plan. the researcher and site should request a more detailed monitoring plan sectio
    8·1 answer
  • tonya is interested in studying psychological disorders. if she wants to study the classification system most often used in the
    15·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!