Answer:
Consumer spending plummeted, factories slowed down production, and companies fired workers. The wages of those still employed were cut, making it hard for people to support their families since all the money was gone. American consumers lost their homes to foreclosure and lost (or sold) many of their possessions.
Answer:
It sure is different
Explanation:
This statement makes Carolinas response more evasive. An evasive answer is an answer given when a person is trying to avoid giving an honest answer to a direct question or their true feelings about something. Carolina gave an evasive answer are so that she would not have to admit the truth. Giving her true opinion may cause negative implications from Arthur.
A.) Income, Lifestyles, and Beliefs. The rest don't make sense.
Answer:
a) is less effective than a direct cash transfer to poorer nations.
Explanation:
Posner and Sunstein affirm that the policies imposed on rich countries and especially the USA on combating climate change are not really beneficial policies. This is because he states that the USA, although it is largely responsible for the increase in climate change, is not one of the countries most affected by them, so it may seem unfavorable for the government to adopt changes that will promote a large expenditure of money, once that are not affected by the problem. However, the countries most affected are poor countries that, although they are most interested in changes, do not have the money to promote them. In that case, it would be more beneficial for rich countries, such as the United States, instead of promoting economic spending to lessen the impact on climate change, to donate money to affected poor countries, allowing them to use that money to promote beneficial changes in their region.
Answer:
A zone of peace is then defined as a discrete geographical region of the world in which a group of states have maintained peaceful relations among themselves for a period of at least thirty years.
Explanation:
