3. area=legngth tiimes width legnth is 10 more than 2 times width l=10+2w lw=area=(10+2w)w=10w+2w^2 area=3600 3600=10w+2w^2 so divide by 2 1800=5w+w^2 subtract 1800 from both sides (note they used x instead of w) 0=w^2+5w-1800 then the facotred form is (w-40)(w+45)=0
0 product property measn if you have xy, then x and or y =0
therefor w-40=0 and w+45=0 w=40 or -45 discard negative because negative legnth is not possible
explian how solution relates to situation it is math so it is correct because we represented it corrrectly
the other solution is because of math and eliminate negative legnth becasue tha tis not possible basically because we represented it correctly not a very clear quetion to answer
basically 'because it represents the solution so we solved it and it is correct'
#3: In the first paragraph, the equation is x² + 5x - 1800 = 0 . Here's where this equation comes from: Call the width of the park 'x'. Then, according to the question, the length is (2x + 10). When you multiply (width) x (length) to get the area, and simplify the product, it turns out that x² + 5x - 1800 = 0 . But don't forget . . . 'x' started out being the width, and when you figure out what 'x' is, that'll be the width of the dog park.
3.a). is factoring the equation, getting ready to solve it.
3.b). is finding the solutions for 'x' from the factored form. Remember that every quadratic equation has two solutions. In this one, they are x = 40 and x = -45 .
'x' is the width of the dog park. Can it be both values ? Can it be only one of them ? Can it be 40 ? How about -45 ?
3.c). 'x' is the width of the real dog park. In the real world, there's no way the city engineers can build it with a negative width. That would be totally silly. So the real width 'x' = 40 yards.
Now look way back at the question: "The length of the park is 10 more than twice the width."
The width is 40 yards. Twice the width is 80 yards. 10 more than that is 90 yards. ==> The length is 90 yards.
Now we have (length = 90 yards) and (width = 40 yards).
How do we know if these are correct ? Well, let's use them to calculate the area.
Area = (length) x (width) = (90 yards) x (40 yards) = 3,600 square yards.
That's what the question said ! We got the right numbers ! yay ! _______________________________________________
#4 This one is very similar to the dog park in many ways.
Again, in the first paragraph, the signs are missing from the equation. The correct equation is: x² + 6x - 55 = 0 .
This is also a tricky question, because some of the information in the first paragraph is only there to confuse you. That business about "... increase both the height and the width ... by 3 inches." You don't need that ! It may come up in #5, I don't know. But here in #4, it never asks anything about it, and you don't need to know it. All you need to know is that it's a "square image". That does that tell you ? It tells you that the height and width are equal ! That's why the equation x² + 6x - 55 = 0 "can be used to find the height and width of the original image" . They're both the same.
4.a). is factoring the equation, getting ready to solve it.
4.b). is finding the solutions for 'x' from the factored form. Remember that every quadratic equation has two solutions. In this one, they are x = 5 and x = -11 .
'x' is a dimension of the image. Can it be either value ? Can it be only one of them ? Can it be 5 ? How about -11 ?
4.c). 'x' is a dimension of the real image. In the real world, there's no way the graphic designer can start with an image that has a negative dimension. That would be totally silly.
So the real dimension of the image is 5 inches. Since it's square, the length and width are both 5 inches. ________________________________________
Now I'll just bet that there's another problem coming along to ask you what the area of the new, bigger image is going to be, after he increases both the height and the width of the image by 3 inches. You don't need to worry about crossing that bridge until you come to it.
To find the unit vector in the direction of u, and also with the same sign, just divide each coordinate of u by ||u||. So the vector you are looking for is
