Explain how predation, disease, and competition impact a population-based upon scale and distribution of the organisms.

1 answer:

tatiyna2 years ago

6 0

All three would decrease the size of the population of the organism. If an organism suddenly has a new predator, the organism's population will decline and it is likely that the members of the prey's population would disperse in an attempt to survive. Disease would just kill off the population in general, maybe the organism's population would distribute itself differently in order to avoid catching the disease. Competition would decrease the amount of food, water, and/or land available to the organism's population causing it to decrease or change habitats in an attempt to find another food source

You might be interested in

Which is not an extrinsically motivated action? choose all that apply

Kipish [7]

Answer:

we cant we need the answers that apply to it

Explanation:

3 0

2 years ago

Read 2 more answers

What 6 characteristics distinguish archaebacteria from eubacteria

torisob [31]

The other two Domains being "Bacteria" and "Eukarya" (which includes us humans). Archaebacteria are characterized by having different cell call components, coenzymes and RNA Sequences compared to bacteria. ... Eubacteria have a rigid cell wall. However, they can be both gram positive and gram-negative.

8 0

3 years ago

When the chromosomes are making a copy during interphase how many chromosomes will there be after it makes a copy?

valkas [14]

Answer: 2

Explanation:

4 0

2 years ago

Describe the function of Chloropasts

Anna11 [10]

Answer:

Chloroplasts are found in plant cells, they make up the green pigment ( chlorophyll ) which manufactures food for the plant during photosynthesis process.

5 0

2 years ago

37. A scientist carries out an experiment. How could she help other scientists judge the validity of her results? (2 points)

algol [13]

Answer:

Let other scientists closely review her work

Explanation:

Ideally, experiments are carried out by scientists to find solution to an observed problem or provide answer to a scientific question. However, the outcome of experiments are not generally accepted in the world of science until they are peer-reviewed.

Peer review is when other scientists in the same field (peers) with the scientist performing the experiment make a thorough evaluation in order to ascertain its quality as a scholarly research. Hence, in this question, the scientist could help other scientists judge the validity of her results by LETTING OTHER SCIENTISTS CLOSELY REVIEW HER WORK.

3 0

2 years ago