Answer:People are horrible at keeping secrets. As in, really, really bad at it (no matter what anyone may tell you to the contrary). And you know what? We’re right to be. Just like the two Rhesus Macaques in the picture above, we have an urge to spill the beans when we know we shouldn’t—and that urge is a remarkably healthy one. Resist it, and you may find yourself in worse shape than you’d bargained for. And the secreter the secret, the worse the backlash on your psyche will likely be.
I never much cared for Nathaniel Hawthorne. I first dreaded him when my older sister came home with a miserable face and a 100-pound version of The House of the Seven Gables. I felt my anxiety mount when she declared the same hefty tome unreadable and said she would rather fail the test than finish the slog. And I had a near panic attack when I, now in high school myself, was handed my own first copy of the dreaded Mr. H.
Now, I’ve never been one to judge books by size. I read War and Peace cover to cover long before Hawthorne crossed my path and finished A Tale of Two Cities (in that same high school classroom) in no time flat. But it was something about him that just didn’t sit right. With trepidation bordering on the kind of dread I’d only ever felt when staring down a snake that I had mistaken for a tree branch, I flipped open the cover.
Luckily for me, what I found sitting on my desk in tenth grade was not my sister’s old nemesis but The Scarlet Letter. And you know what? I survived. It’s not that the book became a favorite. It didn’t. And it’s not that I began to judge Hawthorne less harshly. After trying my hand at Seven Gables—I just couldn’t stay away, could I; I think it was forcibly foisted on all Massachusetts school children, since the house in question was only a short field trip away—I couldn’t. And it’s not that I changed my mind about the writing—actually, having reread parts now to write this column, I’m surprised that I managed to finish at all (sincere apologies to all Hawthorne fans). I didn’t.
But despite everything, The Scarlet Letter gets one thing so incredibly right that it almost—almost—makes up for everything it gets wrong: it’s not healthy to keep a secret.
I remember how struck I was when I finally understood the story behind the letter – and how shocked at the incredibly physical toll that keeping it secret took on the fair Reverend Dimmesdale. It seemed somehow almost too much. A secret couldn’t actually do that to someone, could it?
Explanation:
The faulty logic that the given sentence contains is B. Either-or Fallacy. An either-or fallacy is the limiting of possible answers into two or it is oversimplifying. In the given sentence above, it only gives two possible answers: either meeting the deadline, or if not the town will suffer.
Answer:
a unit of grammatical organization next below the sentence in rank and in traditional grammar said to consist of a subject and predicate
Explanation:
Answer: Collaborative discussion
Explanation:
A group discussion or a collaborative discussion is considering a group of people that are talking about issues or situations that are trying to solve or identify the factors of it.
It has the following factors such as the discussion must include many of the people that are in the group, not only a couple of them.
The discussion should be able to consider information or issues by many of them and everybody should have their words for speaking. It should have a sense of audience and people in the group must be able to learn about how they can write the conventions with peers.
Trough these conventions they must have focus on the ones who are reading and about their expectations. It should improve the techniques of writing and improve their writing or literature material.
Also, they should be able to answer the questions of others.
There are many way's to define, " Loaded. " The common definition is carrying or bearing a large wieght. "
