Answer:
-3 and 2
Step-by-step explanation:
Answer:
(a)Attached
(b)69 degrees
(b)The ladder is safe
Step-by-step explanation:
(a)See attached diagram
The wall is length |AB| and the ladder is length |AC|
(b)
(c)Jamie wants the angle of the ladder makes with the ground to be no greater than 75 degrees for safety reasons.
Since the angle formed between the ground and the ladder (69 degrees) is less than 75 degrees, the ladder is safe the way it is positioned.
1. If x=6, 6+37=?46 43≠46. It isn’t a solution.
2. If x=12, 12+37=?46 49≠46. it’s not a solution.
3. If x=9, 9+37=?46. 46=46. It’s a solution!
4. If x=83, 83+37=?46. 120≠46. Not a solution.
Only x=9 Is a solution.
Hope it helps!
We have been given that PQ bisects 
. In the second statement of the given two-column proof, the statement is 
.
This implies that the two angles formed by bisection of angle by the line PQ are equal. We know that the reason for this is simple. It is the definition of bisection of an angle that the two smaller angles formed will be equal to each other.
Therefore, the reason for statement 2 of the given two column proof is c) Definition of bisect
Answer:
$0 < p ≤ $25
Step-by-step explanation:
We know that coach Rivas can spend up to $750 on 30 swimsuits.
This means that the maximum cost that the coach can afford to pay is $750, then if the cost for the 30 swimsuits is C, we have the inequality:
C ≤ $750
Now, if each swimsuit costs p, then 30 of them costs 30 times p, then the cost of the swimsuits is:
C = 30*p
Then we have the inequality:
30*p ≤ $750.
To find the possible values of p, we just need to isolate p in one side of the inequality.
So we can divide both sides by 30 to get:
(30*p)/30 ≤ $750/30
p ≤ $25
And we also should add the restriction:
$0 < p ≤ $25
Because a swimsuit can not cost 0 dollars or less than that.
Then the inequality that represents the possible values of p is:
$0 < p ≤ $25
