An argument that is not against specializing in a single good in the real world is that specialization in a single good makes dumping easier and more effective.
If a country specializes in a single good, less waste will be produced and it can be dumped easily at one place and can be used or recycled more easily than to dump several different kinds of goods as they will need different technologies and to segregate them will be a hard job to do.
Countries improve their production of the commodity in which they specialize. There are many benefits to consumers if a country does so as specialization lowers the opportunity cost of production, increasing global production and lowering prices. These reduced pricing and increased supply benefit consumers.
To learn more about specialization in single good here
brainly.com/question/19018593
#SPJ4
Answer: True - Monopolistic competition
Explanation:
The monopolistic competition is one of the type of imperfect competition in which the various types of industries selling the products and the services that is basically differentiated from others.
In the monopolistic competitors, the different types of decision taken by an organizations are not directly affecting the other competitors in the market.
According to the question, the J. Pitner's is basically refers to the monopolistic competition in the given competitive environment as it helps in establishing the reputation by offering the various types of high quality services.
Therefore, Monopolistic competition is the correct answer.
Answer:
Balance sheet is the correct answer because it tells about the worth of company, its assets, shareholders funds (Equity) and amount borrowed by the company (Liability). Balance sheet is also known as Statement of Financial Position (SOFP)
All the other options tells about the earnings and costs of the company not about the assets and liabilities of the company.
When a manager needs to make a decision using the ethical decision-making process and reaches the second stage, they check whether the decision violates the c. fundamental rights of any stakeholders
The ethical decision-making process involves making decisions that are consistent with the relevant ethical views of the company which it draws from the society it is based in.
The second stage of this process involves checking whether the ethics involved in a certain decision, would violate the fundamental rights of shareholders which include:
- The right to ownership
- The right to Dividends
- The rights to evaluate corporate decisions
- The right to voting power
This is to ensure that the shareholders are taken care of because the first duty of a manager is to their shareholders.
In conclusion, managers need to check whether a decision affects the fundamental rights of shareholders before they embark on it.
<em>Find out more at brainly.com/question/8864856.</em>
<em />
The options for this question include:
a. utilitarian beliefs
b. the global commons
c. the fundamental rights of any stakeholders
d. home country values
