During the 1840s, conflicts between the United States and
Britain heightened. Texas, the autonomous republic, turn out to be the emphasis
of many foreign powers. While Mexico supposed it to be a revolting area they
would later recuperate power over it, they really had already lost control of
it. Britain became fascinated in it for many motives. First, they supposed it
would control southern American expansionists. Another was a financial reason;
they wanted to use Texas to produce cotton, and no stretched have to be reliant
on Southern cotton plantations. They also believed that they could use Texas in
struggling Americans and test the Monroe Doctrine. Worried for Britain's purposes
in controlling Texas, Tyler approved joint resolution that seized Texas into
the United States before Britain could have a chance. Pressures with Britain
also prejudiced America's choice to discuss for a bigger part of the Oregon
territory. While the British had solid holdings to the land, American
population grew quickly to the area. Sooner or later, the negotiated on the
line of 49̊̊, gaining territory while evading war. Far ahead, when Mexico declined
to sell Mexico to Polk, there were reports that Britain was around to acquire
California. This would mean that the United States would not be capable to protect
the Monroe Doctrine. This inclined Polk's decision to accelerate the announcement
of war against Mexico.
Answer:
Bias
Explanation:
If they are bias they could be holding out information.
<span>6,000 visitors , i think.</span>
Yes, personally I think when there is an opposing force wreaking havoc amongst your allies, you must take action to stop them. If the United States had not interfered during World War I and World War II there could have been a drastically different outcome.
Liberty, Individualism, Equality and self government :)