1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Rainbow [258]
3 years ago
8

How did the u.s. supreme court rule in the case of schenck v. united states (1919)?

History
1 answer:
kirill115 [55]3 years ago
3 0
U.S. Supreme Court ruled on March 3, 1919, that the freedom of speech protection afforded in the U.S. Constitution's First Amendment could be restricted if the words spoken or printed represented to society a "clear and present danger."
You might be interested in
During the Continental Congress, two plans were put forth to create a design for Congress. Which of the following best describes
zhuklara [117]
It would be the second one .
6 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
The pentagon papers showed that nixon had no idea how to handle the war in vietnam. proved that nixon lied when he promised duri
SIZIF [17.4K]
Whats the question?????
5 0
3 years ago
How might fighting discrimination in south Africa have influenced Gandhi when he returned to India
vlabodo [156]
Because Gandhi also fought for discrimination
4 0
2 years ago
Which one of the following statements is most accurate for law enforcement? A. Law enforcement agencies are employed by the cour
Vitek1552 [10]

I believe the answer is: C. Law enforcement officers are mainly required to uphold the law.

Because of this the scope of action which can and cannot be done by law enforcement is limited in a very strict regulation. If the law enforcement disobey this limitation, the suspect could even sue the law enforcement and all of the charge can be nullified.

5 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
What are some pros and cons of being a merchant in the middle ages?
qaws [65]
The pros were that you were being protected by the guild in case of something bad happening you like getting hurt or similar. They would help you and your family for example. The cons were that you wouldn't be able to dictate the price of your wares which was done to prevent exploitation of consumers, so even if you were in a position to establish a personal monopoly, you couldn't and you couldn't become richer than what is the adequate wealth for a merchant.
5 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • served a role between the Sumerians and the gods? a. farmers c. war chiefs b. priests d. political leaders
    10·2 answers
  • Which of the following Southwestern American Indian groups disappeared sometime around the year 1300?
    6·1 answer
  • (LC)What was the purpose of the Palmer Raids? to find and deport illegal immigrants to break the power of the Ku Klux Klan to id
    8·2 answers
  • Question 16 of 33
    9·1 answer
  • Compared to Greece, why was Persia able to organize such a massive empire ?
    9·2 answers
  • What makes a country great? Does the United States align with what you believe
    8·1 answer
  • In the Satires, Horace made fun of human weakness.
    5·1 answer
  • What was the result of the Three-Fifths Compromise?
    7·2 answers
  • Kookaburra interesting facts
    7·2 answers
  • These people were accepted in the Abbasid Empire:
    6·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!