The correct answer to this open question is the following.
Although the question does not have any statements or options, we can say that the Supreme Court's rationale for the decision in McDonald v Chicago was that the Court reversed the decision made by the 7th. Circuit, explaining that the 14th Amendment to the US Constitution supports the right including in the 2nd Amendment to have weapons for the self-protection of the citizen in all the states of the Union. So yes, the 2nd. Amendment to the United States Constitution applies to the states. The case McDonald v Chicago was decided on June 18, 2010.
I think its traffic tickets becuase municipal deals with traffic offenses, disturbances of the peace, minor in possession of
tobacco, drugs or alcohol, theft of under $500, curfew violations and
animal cases which occur within the city limits.
Answer:
The functionalist point of see states that frameworks exist in society for unimaginable reasons. Fight analysts watch that stratification impels lopsidedness, such as between well off trade proprietors and down and out laborers. Conventional interactionists see at stratification from a micro-level point of see.
Explanation:
Hope this helps!:)
Answer: Option (B)
Explanation:
L.F.L rule is abbreviated as Lot for Lot rule , and is known as the method or technique utilized for the lot sizing,under which the system in regards with the net requirements that are placed for the respective time period as the order quantity. This approach is generally used for the expensive commodities or the commodities sporadically required.
