Answer:
B. No
Explanation:
First, let's watch what it looks like when a population is not evolving. If a population is in a state called Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium, the frequencies of alleles, or gene versions, and genotypes, or sets of alleles, in that population will stay the same over generations (and will also satisfy the Hardy-Weinberg equation). Formally, evolution is a change in allele frequencies in a population over a very long period of time, so a population in Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium is not evolving.
A comet always points in the opposite direction of the comet hence why it’s called the tail
Answer:
(C) The main predator of these fish is another species of fish on which alligators also prey.
Explanation:
The ecosystems are complex systems, and removing one species of them, always has a chain reaction and affects the population of the other species, be it in a positive or negative manner. In this case, the alligators prey upon fish, multiple different species. The alligators though have been removed from the ecosystem, thus the apex predator exists no more. This has opened up the top predator niche in the food chain in this particular ecosystem. The predatory fish species had no predators of its own, so its population increased, thus it needed more food, and that food was obtained by hunting the other fish species, resulting in a decline in the population of the other species of fish. Only when the carrying capacity is reached in the ecosystem for the predatory fish, the population of the other fish will stop declining.
The comparison and contrast between the raft and the shore has something to do with freedom. On the river, Huck and Jim are free from the legal, societal and cultural structures which is the opposite if they were on the shore. However, their freedom on the raft was only for a short period of time. When<span> they went back on the shore, they were once again forced to comply with the </span>laws. The<span> similarities between the raft and the shore </span>are<span> natural. They are both are connected with geographical features.</span><span> </span>
Answer:
Plants would be unable to grow and produce oxygen for the animals.
Explanation:
Sunlight, which supports plants, is considered an abiotic factor. If there were no sunlight, plants wouldn't be able to grow, which means no oxygen for many living things found in that specific ecosystem. In other words, that ecosystem would become uninhabitable.
