True or false, is it a question, statement???
The case <em>Miranda v. Arizona (1966)</em> was a landmark decision of the Supreme Court in which the court established that prosecutors cannot use a person's statements made in response to interrogation in police custody as evidence at their trial, unless the person was informed of what is known as "Miranda warning," but voluntarily waived these rights.
A "Miranda warning" is an explanation given to people arrested that informs them of the right to consult with an attorney before and during questioning. It also informs them of the right against self-incrimination before police questioning. The court's ruling protect those accused of a crime because it prevents them from incriminating themselves. It also reminds them of the importance of an attorney for achieving a successful trial.
Answer:
True
Explanation:
every legal dispute Is required going through formal court proceedings So, People often choose to pursue alternative forms of dispute resolution that are fewer adversarial
That's why It's True.
Answer:
Explanation:
C is correct because it’s correct
Woodrow Wilson believed that high tariffs <span>encouraged monopolies. It has cut the competition with American goods.</span>
