Answer:
The US Supreme Court’s decision fair and benevolent to Dred Scott and his family is described below in complete detail.
Explanation:
The Dred Scott judgment was the U.S. Supreme Court's judgment on March 6, 1857, that has existed in a free state and region did not authorize a slave character, Dred Scott, to his independence.
They dictated that African Americans, whether they were slaves or had parents who were slaves, had no constitutional avenue in court. They believed that the Missouri Compromise was illegal. In the cores of the court, Dred Scott had no constitutional right to demand his freedom.
Explanation:
because they paid them to do that
<span>Answer:
They all fought for their freedom. Believed that they should be able to be free. They just all did it different and in different parts of the world. MartĂ wanted to free Cuban's. He was a Cuban patariot. He fought for independence and created war, for freedom. Emilio was a philipean nationalist. He wanted his freedom. He help the Americans in the Spanish-American war. He helped Americans fight against Spanish so he could be free from Spanish. Villa was a rebel leader and help the mexico. But got chases for a while until the general gave up and left.</span>
