Answer:
Nobody wants war again.
Nobody wants to loose life's again.
So peace and Accord are being tried to keep to prevent the dirty history of war repeating itself.
Explanation:
The Civil War had a greater impact on American society and the polity than any other event in the country's history.
It was also the most traumatic experience endured by any generation of Americans.
At least 620,000 soldiers lost their lives in the war which sums up to 2 percent of the American population in 1861.
The Civil War paved the way for Americans to live, learn and move about in ways that had seemed all but inconceivable just a few years earlier. With these doors of opportunity open, the United States experienced rapid economic growth.
War destroys communities and families and often disrupts the development of the social and economic fabric of nations. The effects of war include long-term physical and psychological harm to children and adults, as well as redu
Raphaels well known fresco the school of athens in both its subject matter and harmonious arrangements summarizes teh ideals envisioned by the Renaissance popes.
<h3>What is
Renaissance popes?</h3>
Between the Western Schism and the Reformation, the papal history experienced the Renaissance Papacy. Western Christianity was largely free of schism and significant disputed papal claimants from the Council of Constance's election of Pope Martin V in 1417 to the Reformation in the 16th century.
Julius II was the greatest papal patron of the arts and one of the most powerful and influential popes of the Renaissance. His friendship with Michelangelo and his support of notable artists like Raphael and Bramante are what people will remember him for most.
Julius II was the greatest papal patron of the arts and one of the most powerful and influential popes of the Renaissance.
To know more about Renaissance popes follow the link:
brainly.com/question/879750
#SPJ4
Idk because we need
More information please
C, because smaller states wanted equal representation despite their population.
I gotchu bro
Answer:
Social responsibility is an ethical framework and suggests that an entity, be it an organization or individual, has an obligation to act for the benefit of society at large.[citation needed] Social responsibility is a duty every individual has to perform so as to maintain a balance between the economy and the ecosystems. A trade-off may exist between economic development, in the material sense, and the welfare of the society and environment,[1] though this has been challenged by many reports over the past decade.[when?][2][3] Social responsibility means sustaining the equilibrium between the two. It pertains not only to business organizations but also to everyone whose any action impacts the environment.[4] This responsibility can be passive, by avoiding engaging in socially harmful acts, or active, by performing activities that directly advance social goals. Social responsibility must be intergenerational since the actions of one generation have consequences on those following.[5]
Businesses can use ethical decision making to secure their businesses by making decisions that allow for government agencies to minimize their involvement with the corporation.[6] For instance if a company follows the United States Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) guidelines for emissions on dangerous pollutants and even goes an extra step to get involved in the community and address those concerns that the public might have; they would be less likely to have the EPA investigate them for environmental concerns.[7] "A significant element of current thinking about privacy, however, stresses "self-regulation" rather than market or government mechanisms for protecting personal information".[8] According to some experts, most rules and regulations are formed due to public outcry, which threatens profit maximization and therefore the well-being of the shareholder, and that if there is not an outcry there often will be limited regulation.[9]
Some critics argue that corporate social responsibility (CSR) distracts from the fundamental economic role of businesses; others argue that it is nothing more than superficial window-dressing, or "greenwashing";[10] others argue that it is an attempt to pre-empt the role of governments as a watchdog over powerful corporations though there is no systematic evidence to support these criticisms. A significant number of studies have shown no negative influence on shareholder results from CSR but rather a slightly negative correlation with improved shareholder returns.[11]
Explanation:
plzz mark me as brainlist
