Yeah for sure i guess ...
Answer:
Kindly see attached organized table for clarity.
Item cash Net income
a Purchase of Supplies of cash -$133 -
b Adjusting entry for use of supplies - -$31
c Made sales on account - $1,297
d Received cash from customer on acct $865 -
e Purchased equipment for cash -$2,528 -
f Depreciation of building to be recorded - -$610
Answer:
remains unchanged as price increases when demand is unit elastic.
Explanation:
Total revenue = price × quantity
Demand is elastic when a small change in price has a greater effect on the quantity demanded.
If price is increased and demand is elastic, quantity demanded would fall more than the increase in price and total revenue falls.
Demand is inelastic if a small change in price has little or no effect on quantity demanded.
If price is increased and demand is inelastic, change in quantity demanded would be less than changes in price. As a result, total revenue would increase.
Demand is unit elastic if a change in price has an equal proportional effect on quantity demanded. The elasticity of demand always sums up to one.
If price is increased and demand is unit elastic, there would be no change in total revenue.
I hope my answer helps you
Answer:
14.35%
Explanation:
Simon Software Co
rs= 12%
D/E = 0.25
rRF= 6%
RPM= 5%
Tax rate = 40%.
We are going to find the firm’s current levered beta by using the CAPM formula which is :
rs = rRF+ RPM
12%= 6% + 5%
= 1.2
We are going to find the firm’s unlevered beta by using the Hamada equation:
=bU[1 + (1 −T)(D/E)]
Let plug in the formula
1.2= bU[1 + (0.6)(0.25)]
1.2=(1+0.15)
1.2= 1.15bU
1.2÷1.15
1.0435= bU
We are going to find the new levered beta not the new capital structure using the Hamada equation:
b= bU[1 + (1 −T)(D/E)]
Let plug in the formula
= 1.0435[1 + (0.6)(1)]
=1.0435(1+0.6)
=1.0435(1.6)
= 1.6696
Lastly we are going to find the firm’s new cost of equity given its new beta and the CAPM:
rs= rRF+ RPM(b)
Let plug in the formula
= 6% + 5%(1.6696)
= 14.35%
Answer:
False
Explanation:
A proposed trade of 12.5 pounds of butter for 20 guns may NOT be mutually agreeable to both countries.
The main idea of comparative advantage is NOT trade by barter but buying and selling. Comparative advantage is a principle that states that a country should produce more of the goods and services which it can produce at a lower opportunity cost than that of trade partners and thereafter sell to those partners at a lower cost than they would have produced it themselves in the bid to be self reliant.
It is difficult to agree to such a deal of 12.5 pounds of butter for 20 guns because it is impossible to conclude that they are even or equal in value. The both countries should sell to each other as money is a common means of exchange.
