1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
swat32
3 years ago
14

Explain the reasons for U.S. neutrality during the 1920s and 1930s. How did ideas about neutrality change during the period from

the end of World War I to the passage of the Lend-Lease Act? Be sure to include any events, terms, or people that may support your response. I NEED 1 paragraph
History
2 answers:
tekilochka [14]3 years ago
5 0

Answer:

The United States decided to stay neutral in the 1920’s and 1930’s.

The reason for the United States decision was because they wanted to stay

as an isolationist country. The United States did not want to be a part of other

nations affairs. Instead they wanted to focus on their own problems. They

also did not want to be a part of the war. In the beginning the ideas about

neutrality started to change when President Roosevelt wanted to support

China. He did not want to follow the Neutrality Acts. The President decided to

use the Cash-and-Carry system. He believed that helping democratic

governments was way more important than keeping the U.S neutral. We start

to see the ideas about neutrality alter when Roosevelt signed the Lend-Lease

Act. This authorized Roosevelt to sell arms or protective aid to other nations

without them having to pay in cash.

Explanation:

iVinArrow [24]3 years ago
3 0
<span>. The US had always been an Isolationist country, meaning that they tried to stay out of foreign affairs. This is probably because of the difficulty we were experiencing internally. We ended up sending help to Britain and the Allied forces because they had more democratic governments, while the Axis forces were more authoritarian. The US was inclined to help democratic countries because they would be stronger allies and not nearly as hostile.</span>
You might be interested in
Is this statement true or false? Woodland Indians used the bark spruce trees to make objects like canoes and baskets i will give
denis-greek [22]

the statement is true i believe

3 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
What's the abolitionist movement <br>AND EXPLAIN
viva [34]

Answer:l abicionismo es una doctrina que defiende la anulación de leyes, preceptos o costumbres que se consideran atentatorios a principios éticos y morales. El término se aplicó principalmente a la corriente que propugnaba la abolición1​ de la esclavitud. Tiene total relación con el liberalismo (siglos XVIII-XIX), aunque ya habían surgido abolicionistas en siglos anteriores, como los religiosos Francisco José de Jaca y Epifanio de Moirans, entre ot

Aún hoy en día, en pleno siglo XXI, sigue existiendo esclavitud incuestionable en determinadas áreas de países como Brasil. En el año 2003, por ejemplo, el entonces presidente Luiz Inácio Lula da Silva hizo publicar una lista con los nombres de los hacendados condenados en las dos últimas décadas por tenencia de esclavos.

Existe evidencia que permite reconocer de las estrategias de resistencia de las mujeres negras esclavizadas que les permitieron demandar su libertad durante el período colonial para, las cuales estuvieron dirigidas a enfrentar el discurso del poder colonial mediante el recurso de las demandas judiciales, en una época en la que se suponía que no sabían, no podían o no tenían por qué hacerlo.

Explanation:

8 0
2 years ago
What impact did Lewis Hine’s photographs most likely have? His photographs received little attention or interest from the public
podryga [215]

Answer:

he snicked into factories and took photos of child laboural works and published them.this made factory owners to quit the shameful act

4 0
3 years ago
Location of meetings to determine conditions of peace after world war i
Xelga [282]
They met in Versailles at the Hall of Mirrors. It is a city 10 miles outside Paris.
8 0
3 years ago
How did the Magna Carta affect the development of a national identity in England?
PSYCHO15rus [73]
It resulted in the establishment of the legislative body known as the English parliament. The Magna Carta affected the development of a national identity in England because it was what limited the king and the pope's powers. One example is that the king had to obey the laws of the people so that he could not become too powerful.
5 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • As American population grew between 1820 and 1850, the percentage of Americans living on farms also grew.
    7·1 answer
  • What leader found Hispaniola and the Caribbean
    5·2 answers
  • The framers created Article 5 to ensures that ____________.
    5·1 answer
  • Which person was the leader of the Aztecs when the Spanish arrived in Mexico in 1519?
    15·2 answers
  • What language requirements I needed in order to become a citizen
    7·1 answer
  • "For the last few months, you and I have enjoyed a relationship based on extraordinary cooperation. Because of this cooperation
    5·2 answers
  • Dorothea Lange-Explain who she was in several sentences and what her role war during the Great Depression.
    13·1 answer
  • What might happen if you were on the wrong side of Stalin?
    5·1 answer
  • Question:It was NOT a weakness of the government under the Articles of Confederation.
    7·2 answers
  • Prompt: today many people consider genghis khan a model leader. why do you think this is?
    14·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!