1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
swat32
3 years ago
14

Explain the reasons for U.S. neutrality during the 1920s and 1930s. How did ideas about neutrality change during the period from

the end of World War I to the passage of the Lend-Lease Act? Be sure to include any events, terms, or people that may support your response. I NEED 1 paragraph
History
2 answers:
tekilochka [14]3 years ago
5 0

Answer:

The United States decided to stay neutral in the 1920’s and 1930’s.

The reason for the United States decision was because they wanted to stay

as an isolationist country. The United States did not want to be a part of other

nations affairs. Instead they wanted to focus on their own problems. They

also did not want to be a part of the war. In the beginning the ideas about

neutrality started to change when President Roosevelt wanted to support

China. He did not want to follow the Neutrality Acts. The President decided to

use the Cash-and-Carry system. He believed that helping democratic

governments was way more important than keeping the U.S neutral. We start

to see the ideas about neutrality alter when Roosevelt signed the Lend-Lease

Act. This authorized Roosevelt to sell arms or protective aid to other nations

without them having to pay in cash.

Explanation:

iVinArrow [24]3 years ago
3 0
<span>. The US had always been an Isolationist country, meaning that they tried to stay out of foreign affairs. This is probably because of the difficulty we were experiencing internally. We ended up sending help to Britain and the Allied forces because they had more democratic governments, while the Axis forces were more authoritarian. The US was inclined to help democratic countries because they would be stronger allies and not nearly as hostile.</span>
You might be interested in
Part B<br> What is the unemployment rate in Cuba?
Lilit [14]

Answer:

Cuba dice que tiene una tasa de desempleo más baja que Estados Unidos y la Unión Europea. Cuba cerró el año 2016 con una tasa de desempleo del 2%, inferior a la de los Estados Unidos (4,7%), a la de España (18,63%) o a la de la Unión Europea (8,2%).

6 0
3 years ago
Why might Charles V have wanted to capture Martin Luther?
Sladkaya [172]
In January 1521, Pope Leo X excommunicated Luther. Three months later, Luther was called to defend his beliefs before Holy Roman Emperor Charles V at the Diet of Worms, where he was famously defiant. For his refusal to recant his writings, the emperor declared him an outlaw and a heretic. Hope this helps
4 0
3 years ago
From comparing quality of life in EU and Non E.U. countries, which country was ranked the best?
Doss [256]
I say Spain or Greece I remember doin this but I forgot my answer I got it right but it’s either Spain or Greece
7 0
3 years ago
Plzzzzzzzzzz i need this by tomorrow
FrozenT [24]
<h3>Native American slavery “is a piece of the history of slavery that has been glossed over,” says Linford D. Fisher, associate professor of history at Brown University. “Between 1492 and 1880, between 2 and 5.5 million Native Americans were enslaved in the Americas in addition to 12.5 million African slaves.”</h3>
<h3>While natives had been forced into slavery and servitude as early as 1636, it was not until King Philip’s War that natives were enslaved in large numbers, Fisher writes in the study. The 1675 to 1676 war pitted Native American leader King Philip, also known as Metacom, and his allies against the English colonial settlers.</h3>
<h3>During the war, New England colonies routinely shipped Native Americans as slaves to Barbados, Bermuda, Jamaica, the Azores, Spain, and Tangier in North Africa, Fisher says.</h3><h3>In 1721, 45 years after the end of King Philip’s War, the Connecticut General Assembly took up the question of second-generation Native American child slaves. The Native American children who had been placed as servants in English households after the war had grown up and had children of their own. What should be done with them? Fisher writes that while leaders did not approve of enslaving them, they also did not want to set them free, so that generation of children also became indentured servants.</h3>
<h3>Native Americans sold overseas occasionally made it back to the United States, Fisher writes. Others died or disappeared into a wider slave market and labor force, or became established in the locations where they were sent, like the modern-day community of individuals in Bermuda who claim New England Indian descent.</h3><h2>The Boston Massacre was not really a massacre, but more like a riot. In fact only five people died.</h2><h2>One of the most common myths is that the BM was the event that led to the Revolutionary War. In fact, many important events led up to the massacre. It was called a massacre by the use of propaganda. It mainly started by the British trying to enforce laws.</h2><h2>British Soldiers were sent to America to enforce the Proclamation and to maintain order but their presence just made matter worse.</h2><h2>It all started March 5 by a couple of boys throwing snowballs at British soldiers. A crowd soon gathered throwing ice and making fun of them. Soon after, the British started firing wildly. Other weapons were clubs, knives, swords, and a popular weapon, your own bare hands.</h2><h2>The people that died are: Crispus Attacks, one of the more famous people who was an African American sailor, Samuel Gray, a worker at rope walk, James Caldwell, a mate on a American ship, Samuel Maverick, who was a young seventeen year old male, and Patrick Carr, a feather maker.</h2><h2>The purpose of the Boston Massacre was to try to make liberal and moderate people become radicals. It was really an accident and the radicals tried to use propaganda and turn something small into something big. The British soldiers were accused of Murder and manslaughter. To represent them was John Adams, a relative of Samuel Adams. Adams wanted the trial to get over and didn’t want the truth to come out. The Boston Massacre and misleading visual representation by Paul Revere could have been one cause of a later war.</h2><h2>The BM increased the hatred between the Americans and the British. The radical people tried to use this minor event as propaganda. Paul Revere and Samuel Adams were happy the few colonists died because they used it as propaganda so the colonist would get mad at the British. Whenever the word propaganda is used it means the truth is stretched</h2>
5 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
How did Hamilton’s and Jefferson’s views of government and economy differ
Mariana [72]

Answer:

Explanation:

Alexander Hamilton believed in a strong central government and weak state governments. Thomas Jefferson, on the other hand, believed that the new nation should have a weak central government and strong state governments since the state governments would be more responsive to the people.

4 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • The pharaohs of the New Kingdom were typically buried ____________________.
    14·1 answer
  • In the election of 1860, ___ ___ party was represented by john
    13·1 answer
  • Spain controlled the land of Mexico in ___ of these maps
    15·1 answer
  • What action eventually occurred as a result of speeches such as bush's stateof the union address
    6·2 answers
  • Help!! Please it’s timed
    5·1 answer
  • Why is the Suez Canal Crisis Important?
    10·1 answer
  • The importance India has placed on gains in labor and service jobs creation is because India can A) compete because fewer people
    15·2 answers
  • 1. What prejudices have been applied to Africa with regard to its history?
    9·1 answer
  • Which of the following does the US constitution do?
    12·2 answers
  • Answer if you want or need points
    9·2 answers
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!