1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
DIA [1.3K]
3 years ago
7

Question:It was NOT a weakness of the government under the Articles of Confederation.

History
2 answers:
Ira Lisetskai [31]3 years ago
6 0

Answer:

C.The national government was too powerful and violated state rights.

Anna007 [38]3 years ago
5 0

Answer:

Given: Which of the following was not a weakness of the articles of confederation (1781-1789)? A) a weak "league of friendship" among the states

B) the requirement of unanimous approval by all 13 states for amendments

C) no judicial branch

D) no congressional power to impose taxes

The articles state that the States are entered into a firm league of friendship with each other. This is to improve their common defense, the security of their liberties, general welfare, and so on. Thus the league of friendship is not a weakness. Which means that the answer is A).

Nine of the 13 states are needed to ratify a bill before it becomes a law and all states are needed to accept an amendment, thus B) is a weakness of the articles.

The government under the articles of confederation only contained one legislative body and provided no permanent national judiciary, thus C) is a weakness of the articles.

The Federal government was not able to impose taxes and thus D) is also a weakness of the articles.

OTHER WEAKNESSES

Little or no enforcement of the laws made by the President.

States print their own currency.

No foreign policy.

No federal army.

Lack of power over the states.

Strong state governments and weak federal government.

Each state has one vote, regardless of size.

CONCLUSION: A) “a weak league of friendship among the states” is not a weakness.

Explanation:

• Weaknesses under the Articles of Confederation:

• Problems within Congress-

-Congress had trouble passing laws (9 of the 13 states had to agree before any laws could be passed)

-There was no president or executive branch (no way to make sure that laws passed by Congress were carried out)

- Congress did not have the power to collect the taxes needed to pay for the expenses of the national government

- Congress could not pay the nation's debt nor could it provide government programs and services since it could not force the states into paying money

- no judicial system:

no courts to interpret laws or to judge those that broke(national court system did not exist)

- changing the Articles of Confederation was nearly impossible (A unanimous vote of all 13 states was required before any changes could be made). The way I see it is that all the answers listed are weaknesses that why I am confused...after reading this do you still think it would be answer B?

You might be interested in
The worst single event of the great stock market crash of 1929 was
iren [92.7K]
I'm not entirely sure but i think it was The Great Depression.
3 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
How did Africa change for AST?
Anika [276]

Answer:

i'm black and people be tryna say go back to africa first of all i'm not even from there so the freak you talking about everyone is equal we are all human we just have different skin colors people so crazy for no reason black people stronger now who ever wanna battle aint ready for us.PERIOD!

Explanation:

6 0
3 years ago
THIS IS A POSSIBLE ANSWER FOR THE PROJECT "Comparing Civil Rights Movements around the World", I GOT A 100%
Brilliant_brown [7]

Answer:

THANK YOU!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Explanation:

4 0
3 years ago
Which of the following is NOT a factor that helped to bring down the Roman Empire?
slamgirl [31]
Easy defeat of foreign invaders is obviously positive, so it couldn’t be a factor that would topple an empire. Security is good.
8 0
3 years ago
How did the intolerable act unite people in the American colonist against the British
Talja [164]
I think it is because they all disagreed with the intolerable acts so they all got together and wanted to stop it. if its wrong oops
7 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • What were The basic responsibilities of a colonial citizen?
    8·1 answer
  • When did American suburbs increase dramatically, at a rate of 40 times that of cities? (Between the years 1950s, 60s, 70s, or 80
    15·1 answer
  • State requirement for all dogs to be on leashes in public is which type of law?
    12·2 answers
  • How many people born before 1900 are alive?
    9·1 answer
  • Do you think the columbian exchange had a more profound effect on the old or new world
    5·1 answer
  • How did the events of the Hundred Years' War (1337—1453) contribute to the development of national identity in Europe? (1 point)
    9·2 answers
  • Which describes the pattern of movement during the late nineteenth century? A. A direct democracy to a representative one B. A f
    7·1 answer
  • The Crusades were partially responsible for the development of our modern day banking systems. Create and order a chain of event
    9·1 answer
  • What did the war become once the participating countries began devoting all of their resources to the war effort?
    12·1 answer
  • !<br> Why was<br> Rome able to<br> rise so<br> Successfully?
    15·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!