Answer:
An international company with a Global Information System (GIS) in place "can increase its control over its subsidiaries".
Explanation:
A Global Information System (GIS) is used to gather data on a global scale, that can be used by organizations when making decisions such as; determining what product to produce for what customers, or what services to render.
Information derived through a global information system makes it easier for organizations to tailor their offerings specifically to certain populations.
As such, an international organizations with a GIS can communicate better with, and maintain control over, its subsidiaries in other countries, because it has a better understanding of the population and market in those countries.
Answer:
current assets, such as:
Cash and equivalents.
Short-term investments (marketable securities).
Accounts receivable.
Inventory.
Prepaid expenses.
Any other liquid assets.
Explanation:
The benefits are provided inmediatelly
When the boss hears about this, the employee would probably go under training or in the worst scenario can be fired. A serious company that wanted to be on top most likely wanted individuals who are willing to take different tasks and understand how the business works. The employee should learn about the business and improve.
The United States government was correct in interfering with the growth of Standard Oil. Not only was the company taking advantage of existing situations, but eventually it would have controlled the oil market entirely. If Standard Oil was able to gain control of the market for a long period of time, consumers could have had to pay extremely high prices for the oil that they needed, limiting their purchase of other goods. Or Sample response: The United States government should not have interfered with the growth of Standard Oil. Because the company had managed to reduce production costs, it was able to offer very low prices to consumers. This benefited many Americans. Without the company's production benefits, citizens were not able to take advantage of this infrastructure.
Answer:
By comparing the opportunity cost of producing cheese in the two countries, you can tell that Spain has a comparative advantage in the production of cheese and Germany has a comparative advantage in the production of beer.
Explanation:
- To produce a pound of cheese, Spain gives up to the production of 3 barrels of beer, while to produce the same amount of cheese, Germany gives up to the production of 11 barrels of beer. Then, it is relatively cheaper to Spain to produce cheese, compared to Germany, because for every pound of cheese produced, Spain gives up to fewer barrels of beer. Then, Spain has a comparative advantage in the production of cheese.
- On the other hand, Germany can produce 11 barrels of beer, by giving up to 1 pound of cheese, while Spain can only produce 3 barrels of beer by giving up to one pound of cheese. Germany is more efficient producing beer, because it is relatively cheaper for German compared to Spain, producing and additional barrel of beer in terms of the cheese they do not produce when they produce more beer. Germany has a comparative advantage in the production of beer.