Answer:
The Northern hemisphere is tilted away from the sun
Answer:
See below.
Explanation:
Assuming an initial outstanding common shares of 100,000
100% stock dividend means that another 100,000 shares have been issued,
Total outstanding shares then are = 100,000+100,000 = 200,000
Earnings per share = Net Income / Total shares
EPS = 1,130,000 / 200,000
EPS = $5.65/share
You can compute this by inputting any number of shares and increasing the total number by a 100%.
Hope that helps.
Answer:
SCENERIO 1=BOND
SCENERIO 2=LOAN
SCENERIO 3=STOCK
SCENERIO 4=SECURITIES WHICH ARE GUARANTEED BY LOANS
SCENERIO 5=LOAN
Explanation:
Bond is a type of loan or a financial instrument through which large corporations or Government Institutions borrow money from the public with the aim of paying with a fixed interest rate in a given period.
A Loan is amount requested by an organisation from a financial institution with the aim of paying back with some percentage of interest over a given period of time.
Stocks are also known as shares which forms parts of a particular Company sold to the public with the aim of raising capital, SHARES OR STOCK HOLDERS HAVE CERTAIN RIGHTS TO DIVIDEND AND VOTING TO REPLACE BIARD NENBERS ETC WHEN THE NEED ARISE IN THE ORGANISATION.
Answer: Public tort
Explanation: In simple words, public tort refers to the minor breach of contract by an individual. It is considered as a civil offense but still the acts under this act carries a criminal punishment.
In the given case, Hal did not make the elevator inspected in the seventh story for two years, however all other were inspected as per the rules. Thus, we can conclude that he breached the rule on a small level.
Hence from the above we can conclude that his offense would be classified as public tort.
According to the case, the use of Ph.D. on the ads for hair care products by John Smith is considered an example of the fallacy of inappropriate expertise.
The provided statement is true.
<h3>What is a fallacy?</h3>
A fallacy is an unlawful statement that is used by someone in stating any reasoning or argument which can even be harmful to society.
In the given case, John is having Ph.D. degree in the archaeology field, and his attempt to use the word Ph.D. on the haircare goods marketed by him would be a fallacy in respect of inappropriate expertise. The fallacy could be the use of the Ph.D. word on ads and the inappropriate expertise is that he doesn't have any knowledge regarding skincare and dermatology area.
Therefore, this may create a harmful effect on the individuals who are buying them as it is not authorized by a dermatologist.
Learn more about the fallacy in the related link:
brainly.com/question/2516239
#SPJ1