1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Ne4ueva [31]
3 years ago
13

The Italian universities differed from northern European ones in which of the following ways? Select one: a. Students at norther

n universities were generally older and sought law degrees. b. Students rather than professors constituted the dominant guild. c. Students in northern universities took the trivium, while Italian students studied the quadrivium. d. Italian universities never had the guild system. e. Northern universities tended to teach in vernacular languages while Italian universities usually taught in Latin.
Social Studies
1 answer:
BlackZzzverrR [31]3 years ago
4 0

Answer:

b. Students rather than professors constituted the dominant guild.

Explanation:

But for nothern Europe, professors constituted the dominant guild.

You might be interested in
Legally, property other than land, including both tangible property and intangible property, is considered?
Romashka-Z-Leto [24]

Legally, property other than land, including both tangible property and intangible property, is considered personal property.

Any mobile or intangible asset with a value that can be possessed by a person and isn't classified as real property. Personal property refers to consumer and non-capital products and services, whereas private property often refers to capital or the means of production. Stocks and bonds are examples of investment property that are categorized as capital assets.  The entire personal property portfolio also counts as a capital asset.

There are three distinct categories of personal property: tangible, intangible, and listed. Anything that can be held and has a clear worth is considered tangible personal property, whereas anything that cannot be touched or held has intangible personal property.

To know more about Personal property refer to:  brainly.com/question/14115723

#SPJ4

8 0
1 year ago
The problem with the Articles of Confederation was that: Group of answer choices a) it gave too much power to the people b) it g
kondor19780726 [428]

Answer:

a) it gave too much power to the people.

d) it didn't answer a lot of specific questions as to how to run the country.

Explanation:

The Articles of Confederation failed because they did not give Congress and the national government enough power. The new United States just fought a war to end what they considered tyrannical rule of a strong government that overpowered local government and the leaders of the U.S. feared a powerful central government.

5 0
3 years ago
Why are the research methods of sociologists different from those of most other scientists
kompoz [17]
<span>Because basically, in the first place, both are from different fields. While sociology is more on arts, other sciences such as Physics, Biology and Chemistry are the hard sciences. Hard sciences means that the experimentation requires a very small amount of error, up to one percent. This experimentation uses materials which really expensive and harmful. Meanwhile on sociology, it requires a room of error up to five percent since some of its population is bound to different errors such as human errors, etc.</span>
5 0
3 years ago
If a person pays taxes every year on his income, what type of civic actor
Ganezh [65]

Answer:

justice oriented

Explanation:

becuase...........

4 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
In the case Schenk v. United States, the Supreme Court ruled that the Constitution does not protect a person when "falsely shout
Ket [755]

Answer:

<h3>Freedom of speech.</h3>

Explanation:

  • Freedom of speech is a principal that advocates the freedom of a person to state his/her opinion freely and to impart information and ideas without any restrictions.
  • However, in the case of Schenk v. United States, the Supreme Court ruled that the Constitution does not protect a person when "falsely shouting fire in a theater and causing panic" because freedom of speech does not protect speech that has the potential to incite danger and disharmony in the society.
  • Therefore, in the case of Schenk v. United States, freedom of speech of First Amendment was limited.
6 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • How do new ideas change the way people live?
    10·2 answers
  • Choose the state and capital that border the east coast of the United States. Augusta, Maine Helena, Montana Lansing, Michigan J
    6·1 answer
  • When scientists have disagreements about how we go about knowing and what counts as knowledge, there is a disagreement about?
    13·1 answer
  • 5x+3y=11 <br>4x-y=2<br>solve by substution method​
    13·1 answer
  • Describe the effect of US imperialism on the natives of Hawaii, Puerto Rico, Cuba or the Philippines and explain why the US want
    9·1 answer
  • Why is it important for people to maintain a good credit history
    8·2 answers
  • How is the Seven Years War related to the French and Indian War? (5 points)
    12·2 answers
  • PLZZZZZZZZ HELP ME IM GIVING BRAILIYEST!!!!
    12·1 answer
  • What constitution that we follow today was not our countries first?
    13·2 answers
  • If a person fantasizes about the use of force in sexual relationships, one can conclude that?
    15·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!