In the sentence "These days, parents neglect to watch their children's social media use", we find an example of the hasty generalization fallacy.
Hasty generalization does not present enough evidence to support the argument made and, therefore, generalizes a fact. In the sentence above, there is an affirmation that parents do not watch their children's social media use. How can the speaker state this? Who are these parents: all of them? Just a percentage? What about the parents who do watch their kids' use of social media? Do they not count?
As for the other options given, let's take a look at a brief description of what they mean:
Non sequitur is when a conclusion does not follow the evidence presented. It's an absurd conclusion, considering the information given. --> People like watching movies. Movies have violence. Therefore, having some violence happen to people is desirable.
Post hoc is a fallacy in which the speaker assumes there is a connection between events simply because they happened one after the other. That is, if B happened after A, then B happened because of A. --> If it rained after I had an ice cream, then it rained because I had the ice cream.
False analogy happens when the speaker analyzes two different facts under the same point of view and conditions, drawing a conclusion that is far-fetched. --> Monica is from South America. Alice is also from South America. Therefore, Monica and Alice are from the same country.
by the time i arrived. i looked at the house in utter shock. the house was in a mass of flames. i stood there in shock as i watched my home burn away into nothing but ash
the federal level enjoys supremacy. the national government enjoy sovereign power
the state federal or local level maintains authority depending on the policy area
Supremacy I believe but I’m not sure, this is what I got and found hope this is helpful, if it’s not, I’m sorry, I tried tho.
The correct answer to this open question is the following.
You forgot to include the options for this question. However, we can say the following.
The central idea of "Lake Titicaca" by Michael Angel Asturias is this one: "Titicaca is a place of great spiritual power that inspires a sense of connection between the individual, nature, and the past."
And this is so true. Many historians, archeologists, and scholars that had visited the place agree with the idea that Lake Titicaca is a mystical lake and a prominent place for South American people who respect the traditions of their ancestors.
Lake Titicaca is located in Peru and Bolivia, in the Andes Mountains. For this reason, it is the highest on planet Earth. For the Bolivian and Peruvian people, the lake is a spiritual place and the creation stories of their ancestors refer that the world began in Lake Titicaca.
