Hello. You have not submitted the text to which this question refers. This makes it impossible for your question to be answered. However, I will try to help you in the best possible way.
It is only possible to answer this question by reading the two texts. Also, this is a personal question so first of all, you should reflect on what you think about the dangers that social media can offer to users. Do you think social media can influence you incorrectly? do you think social media can impose negative standards on society? Do you think that social media can promote exaggerated exposure? These are some concepts that you can reflect on to create your opinion about the dangers that social media can cause.
Then, you should read both texts and pay attention to how the authors approach these dangers and which author managed to present an argument that most closely resembles the opinion you have on this subject.
Therefore, you must answer this question by showing how you and this author present similar arguments and opinions.
Answer:
Yick Wo v. Hopkins, 118 U.S. 356, was the first case where the United States Supreme Court ruled that a law that is race-neutral on its face, but is administered in a prejudicial manner, is an infringement of the Equal Protection Clause in the Fourteenth Amendment to the U.S. Constitution.
Explanation:
Answer:
After the fall of Bastille, there was a rush of mixed emotions. People felt "patriotic hope" and pride in their country. They no longer felt fear of violence. They praised their King and were glad he brought reform to France.
Explanation:
There you go... Hope this helps! Good luck:)
Answer:
The North wanted the new states to be free states. Most northerners thought that slavery was wrong and many northern states had outlawed slavery. The South, however, wanted the new states to be slave states
Explanation:
I hope this helped you. :)
