1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
harkovskaia [24]
3 years ago
10

The defense which recognizes that some behaviors may be justified because a greater harm is prevented is:

Social Studies
1 answer:
AnnZ [28]3 years ago
6 0

Answer:

defense of necessity

Explanation:

The description in the question refers to a defense of necessity. This is a court defense that applies when an individual commits a criminal act (usually during an emergency situation), but is done so in order to prevent a greater harm from occurring. Therefore, in these situations, the legal system tends to excuse the individual's criminal action because it is considered justified.

You might be interested in
When a biometric is scanned and allows access to someone who is not authorized that is called a?
harkovskaia [24]
I think false positive, Hope that was correct.
3 0
4 years ago
Which statement describes an example of checks and balances in the Roman Republic?
mrs_skeptik [129]

Answer:

B. A consul vetoed a law passed by the legislature

Explanation:

One branch is checking another. The consul is checking the legislature.

4 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
UNDENIABLE HELP!!!
nekit [7.7K]
Your too young sorry dude
5 0
3 years ago
Which of the following is an accurate comparison of the two court cases?Baker v. Carr (1961) - Shaw v. Reno (1993)A. Ruled that
madreJ [45]

Answer:

(B) Led to the "one-person, one-vote" judicial doctrine - Prohibited oddly-shaped majority-minority districts

Explanation:

Baker v. Carr (1961) is a Supreme Court case concerning equality in voting districts. Decided in 1962, the ruling established the standard of "one person, one vote" and opened the door for the Court to rule on districting cases.

Shaw v. Reno (1993) In 1991, a group of white voters in North Carolina challenged the state's new congressional district map, which had two “majority-minority” districts. The group claimed that the districts were racial gerrymanders that violated the equal protection clause of the Fourteenth Amendment.  In its 1993 decision, the Supreme Court agreed, ruling that race cannot be the predominant factor in creating districts.

5 0
3 years ago
What philosophies did Confucianism value?
Ksju [112]

Answer:

Im pretty sure the first one but i'm not sure

Explanation:

Confucianism is good and peace and stuff like that

7 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • Hello, I need resources and books to help me research the Individual Law​
    11·1 answer
  • Which sentence best describes the origin of hinduism?
    12·1 answer
  • How does rabbits depend on energy from the sun
    12·1 answer
  • Research on gun control in the u.s. has shown that ________.
    12·1 answer
  • Speech on social justice ,zero poverty​
    15·1 answer
  • A place that is ruled by another country
    9·2 answers
  • Why do critics of the supreme court's decision to enhance detainees' legal rights say the judicial branch should not interfere w
    10·1 answer
  • Click the pdf to download it and help me
    5·1 answer
  • "The development of society is a universal process". justify the statement in your own language.
    9·1 answer
  • Please help I'll mark brainliest
    12·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!