Answer:
the supply of oil is very inelastic and the demand for gasoline is inelastic over short periods of time.
Explanation:
In Economics, there are primarily two (2) factors which affect the availability and the price at which goods and services are sold or provided, these are demand and supply.
The law of demand states that, the higher the demand for goods and services, the higher the price it would be sold all things being equal. On the other hand, law of supply states that the higher the price of goods and services, the lower the supply.
The process involved in bringing oil to world markets can take years. Substitutes for oil-based products such as gasoline are limited. As a result, the supply of oil is very inelastic and the demand for gasoline is inelastic over short periods of time.
Answer:
Structural
Explanation:
It is correct to say that Tina's scenario is an example of structural unemployment, that there are structural economic changes, which can have several different reasons, in the case of the above question, the structural change was caused by a technological change that made the newspaper where Tina worked if she scanned, and Tina's skills were not sufficient to keep up with such changes, which resulted in her resignation.
This is a type of long-term unemployment, which can negatively impact a society, with a large number of people unemployed and disqualified for current job openings, to reduce this problem, it is necessary that companies invest in training programs and effective qualifications so that its employees can follow the structural changes that occurred in their jobs.
Answer: Environmental context of the problem
Explanation:
The environmental context of the given problem basically consist of the various types of factors which have a huge impact on the marketing research related problems.
It basically helps in understanding the various types background related concepts about the industry and also about the client issue.
According to the given question, the marketing related issue basically include the forecast, past information and also the constraints of an organization by developing various types of technological skills in the firm.
Therefore, Environmental context of the problem is the correct answer.
<u>Answer: </u>
Benefits are amplified at a point where the minor income efficiency (MRP) is equivalent to the expense of employing a security watch. In this way, a benefit expanding firm will enlist as long as the MRP is more noteworthy than the wages or the expense of recruiting a security monitor.
On the off chance that I need to amplify benefit, at that point I won't enlist the security monitor at a compensation pace of $20 in light of the fact that the expense of recruiting is more noteworthy than the expansion to the complete income or MRP, which is equivalent to $15 (expecting that the security watchman will kill shoplifting).
The above examination shows that a security watchman will be paid a compensation rate for every hour, which is equivalent to the sum spared every hour by the security monitor for wiping out the normal shoplifting every hour.
The sum spared is an expansion to the all out income, and no benefit boosting firm would pay a compensation rate higher than the augmentations to the complete income.
