When an act or law is repealed it can be best described as an end of the law or act. Option C is correct
- When an existing law is rescissed by legislation or constitutional amendment, it is termed a repeal or abrogation.
- A repeal is of 2 basic types; a repeal with a re-enactment or a repeal without replacement.
- A repeal with a re-enactment is commonly used to replace the law with an updated, amended, or seemingly related law
- A repeal without a replacement is used to abolish the provisions of law altogether.
Hence when an act or law is repealed it can be best described as an end of the law or act.
Learn more here: brainly.com/question/251362
For people in the modern world, there may be nothing more difficult to comprehend than the group calling itself the Islamic State, or ISIS. The beheadings, rapes, and other acts of cruelty seem beyond understanding, as does the wanton destruction of priceless ancient monuments. Perhaps most mystifying of all is the way ISIS has been able to recruit young men — and even some young women — from the industrialized West, particularly Europe: the conventional wisdom is that the cure for ethnic and religious violence is “development,” education, and the opportunities provided by free markets. This seems not to be the case.
Because of the mainstream media’s narrow and often misplaced focus, it’s not surprising that most Westerners believe that religious extremism is primarily a problem of Islam. But the fighting in Syria and Iraq is not the only ethnic or religious conflict underway. There has been violence between Sinhalese and Tamils in Sri Lanka, Buddhists and Hindus in Bhutan, Hindus and Sikhs in Punjab, Eritreans and Ethiopians in the Horn of Africa, Hutu and Tutsi in Rwanda, ethnic Russians and Ukrainians in the former Soviet Union, and many more. The fact is, fanaticism, fundamentalism, and ethnic conflict have been growing for many decades—and not just in the Islamic world.
Failure to recognize this trend can lead to the belief that terrorism is a product of nothing more than religious extremism and will end when secular market-based democracies are established throughout the world. Unfortunately the reality is far more complex, and unless we address the underlying causes of conflict and terrorism, a more peaceful and secure future will remain elusive.
To really understand the rise of religious fundamentalism and ethnic conflict we need to look at the deep impacts of the global consumer culture on living cultures throughout the planet. Doing so allows us not only to better understand ISIS and similar groups, but also to see a way forward that lessens violence on all sides.
I hope this Helps...
Jewish tradition is the answer
(pls give me brianliest) <span>He was THE major mover-and-shaker in the Second Continental Congress from 1775-6 busy convincing delegates to vote FOR independence. </span>
<span>But he also knew that he was somewhat abrasive and that some SOUTHERN delegates were not that interested in following the lead of someone from Massachusetts (folks who were widely considered the 'hotheads' in rebellion and pushing for independence). So it was he who encouraged VIRGINIANS to take the lead -- first by getting Richard Henry Lee to obtain from the Virginia legislature a RESOLUTION asking Congress to vote for independence, which Congress did vote for on July 2. </span>
<span>Now Lee would probably have been automatically made head of the committee to write a document EXPLAINING the reasons for the vote for independence (the formal "Declaration of Independence"), but family health issues kept him away and he was replaced by another Virginian, Thomas Jefferson, who (as committee chairmen usually did) drafted the document.</span>