The answer is B. Grassland
Answer:
In my opinion, a reduction in our use of energy would not be a historical step backwards.
Explanation:
We already know that humanity's consumption of fossil fuels is wreaking havoc on the ecosystem. Fossil fuels pollute the environment where they are generated and utilized, and their continued usage harms the climate of the entire world. Nonetheless, altering our behaviors in a significant sense has proven to be quite difficult. As a result, it is not impossible to reduce our energy use significantly, but we may take little efforts to change the way we create energy, such as using fossil fuels. Because fossil fuels are so detrimental to our environment, we should try to reduce its use, but not at the risk of improving our surroundings. There are several methods to change the way we utilize energy now into something more sustainable.
*You can also answer this question based on opinion I think, hope this helps :)
Loss of biodiversity matters because it affects the overall sustainability of organisms in an ecosystem. It also affects how badly an ecosystem will be affected after something, maybe a natural disaster, or maybe a disease, strikes the region. (For example, if a disease affects a certain species of organism, if there was a lot of biodiversity among individuals, some will have some kind of natural immunity to that disease and survive, passing on their favorable traits to the next generation. However, if everybody was the same and did not have the immunity to that disease, that entire population would eventually die out.) <- This is also the reason that lack of biodiversity will inhibit natural selection.
Hope that helped you.
Mark on the address to send the new address please please let me know what
Down syndrome can occur as the embryo has an extra chromosome. As well as this the embryo may die.
