1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
ICE Princess25 [194]
3 years ago
15

360.org, an organization working toward curbing climate change, recently conducted an interview with Jessica for the position of

a public relations officer
However, interviewers Brenda and Laura are divided over whether Jessica should be given the job. Brenda believes that Jessica does not have in-depth knowledge about the issue of global warming and its impact. On the other hand, Laura feels that Jessica would be perfect for the job because she has strong interpersonal skills. Which of the following, if true, would weaken Laura's argument?
A) Jessica was unable to fare well in the written test which analyzed her conceptual skills.
B) Jessica listened intently to the interviewers' questions before answering them.
C) Jessica was unable to communicate clearly why she was right for the job.
D) Jessica was very friendly and courteous with the receptionist while greeting her.
E) Jessica was high on confidence about getting the job because of her strong networking skills.
Social Studies
1 answer:
lorasvet [3.4K]3 years ago
7 0

Answer:

Correct Answer:

C) Jessica was unable to communicate clearly why she was right for the job.

Explanation:

In the job interview which Jessica attended,<em> her application for the position of a public relation officer would be greatly weakened due to her inability to communicate clearly why she was the right candidate for the job despite Laura believing that she is suitable for the job due to her strong interpersonal skill. </em>

<em><u>This is because, interpersonal skill entails ability of someone to  interact with others effectively and work well with others.</u></em> Interpersonal skills range from communication, listening and to attitude.

You might be interested in
Is a dictatorship ever a justifiable form of government? Explain and use evidence from the sources to support your claim.
Andru [333]

Answer:

bhhhhnjm

Explanation:

njnjnimkml

3 0
3 years ago
How does transportation change from the end of the civil War to the early year of the 20th century
sergij07 [2.7K]
Well back in the civil war, it was horseback and carriages, which then later on they invented an engine to make trains, by the 1800's they still use carriages, but they now also have planes,tanks trains and that.    dont plagiarize and write all that i said down 
5 0
4 years ago
Dinesh notices that many people with gym memberships are overweight. He concludes that gym memberships make people gain weight.
lana66690 [7]

The error in Dinesh's confusion over correlation versus causation about his observed correlation between a gym membership and being overweight is based on <u>backward causation</u>.

<h3>What is backward causation?</h3>

Backward causation is a phenomenon that refers to a situation when an effect is regarded as the cause of an event.

For instance, Dinesh should have recognized that many more overweight people would like to have a gym membership than otherwise.

The implication is that Dinesh should not have concluded falsely that gym memberships make people gain weight.

Thus, the error in Dinesh's confusion over correlation versus causation is referred to as <u>backward causation</u>.

Learn more about backward causation at brainly.com/question/10548665

#SPJ1

3 0
2 years ago
The burden of proof required for a victory in a civil case is:
Alenkasestr [34]
Answer: preponderance of evidence.

In a civil case it must be proven that essentially something more than likely occurred in a certain way. This burden of proof is the responsibility of the plaintiff. As compared to a criminal case where the burden of proof is on the defendant (reasonable doubt).
7 0
3 years ago
Marek tells his friend alicia that his dog bit him over the weekend. Horrified, alicia pictures a large, aggressive dog. At the
viva [34]

The answer is<u> "reference".</u>


The Semantic Triangle demonstrates the immediate connection between Words and Thoughts and Thoughts and Thing. Yet, the specked lines speak to the word (sign) isn't the Thing (a referent) and there is no any immediate connection among words and thing. The referent needs some related knowledge and reference about the word or sign to be complete.  

The word implies diverse things to various individuals in various circumstances. Any sign or word which has its own particular significance is gotten a handle on with specific references to it. The way toward getting a handle on or understanding words or signs, which as of now have importance, with the affirmed implications given by the references is known as the significance of importance.

3 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • Oracle bones were used to predict the future. true or false?
    11·1 answer
  • Can you indicate how the Whig party disintegrated because of it's divisions over slavery?
    11·1 answer
  • A stressor would be appraised as a ________ if someone anticipates that it could lead to some kind of harm, loss, or other negat
    6·1 answer
  • Thomas Jefferson suggested to Lewis and Clark that they teach the Native Americans to inoculate themselves against what disease?
    6·1 answer
  • Zebras are an example of an ______ of living things in an ecosystem​
    14·1 answer
  • What was the panic of 1837
    13·2 answers
  • What is the role of an archaeologist?
    11·1 answer
  • Why did the outcome of the French and Indian war lead to tensions between The Colonists and Great Britain?
    9·2 answers
  • List communication skills one may apply when communicating with the pastor​
    15·2 answers
  • Helpppppppppppppppppppppp
    15·2 answers
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!