Answer:
<em><u>blue</u></em><em><u> </u></em><em><u>pens</u></em><em><u>=</u></em><em><u>288</u></em>
Step-by-step explanation:
<em>blue</em><em> </em><em>pens</em><em>=</em><em>720×40%</em>
<em>blue</em><em> </em><em>pens</em><em>=</em><em>720×40/100</em>
<em>blue pens</em><u>=</u><u>288</u>
I believe it should be A.
Answer:
Optimal combination of goods can be determined in an economy that produces only two goods, with production of extra units of the two goods at a minimal marginal social cost. The consumption of the additional units of the two goods being produced will be benefitted by the consumers. This is known as marginal social benefit.
Step-by-step explanation:
Marginal social cost is the change in society's total cost brought about by the production of an additional unit of a good or service. It includes both marginal private cost and marginal external cost.
Marginal social benefit is the change in benefits associated with the consumption of an additional unit of a good or service. It is measured by the amount people are willing to pay for the additional unit of a good or service.
Answer:
see explanation
Step-by-step explanation:
a shift of 3 squares right means add 3 to the x- coordinate
a shift of 1 square down means subtract 1 from the y- coordinate
translation rule is (x, y ) → (x + 3, y - 1 ) , then
(1, 1 ) → (1 + 3, 1 - 1 ) → (4, 0 )
(1, 4 ) → (1 + 3, 4 - 1 ) → (4, 3 )
(3, 1 ) → (3 + 3, 1 - 1 ) → (6, 0 )
Answer:
1. No
2. No
3. Yes
4. No
Step-by-step explanation:
The first one isn't proportional because it doesn't start at 0
The second one isn't proportional because there isn't a pattern between the coordinates
The 3rd one is a proportional relationship because it starts at 0 and there is an equal amount of space between each coordinate and there is evidentially a pattern.
Finally, the 4th one isn't proportional because the last coordinate doesn't correspond w/ the others
Plz mark me brainliest if correct :)
