1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
lesya692 [45]
3 years ago
7

Which is a characteristic of a feudal society?

History
2 answers:
Triss [41]3 years ago
7 0

Answer:

4.  Rigid Class Structure

Explanation:

A feudal society has ranks, such as peasants, merchants, knights, and kings.  Feudal societies were often replaced by industrialization, and did not experience rapid social change.  In addition, most people below merchants could not read, which was the majority of people, contributing to a low literacy rate.  However, feudal societies did have extremely rigid class structure that deemed rights as appropriate due to people's classes.

poizon [28]3 years ago
6 0
4. High literacy rate
You might be interested in
What were the common crises and achievements of seventeenth-century european states?
STALIN [3.7K]
One thing was that a social class system was created. A bad thing would be that there wasn't much medical treatments. This meant people could die of simple things.
4 0
3 years ago
What argument does Paine make in paragraph 21 for why the colonists should rebel? A. Paine argues that the colonists are meant t
shusha [124]
I believe c is the correct answer to your question.
4 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Why did the movement of white settlements into the west cause problems for native Americans?
GrogVix [38]

Answer:

i hope this helps

Explanation:

The government believed it would cost less money and fewer lives to keep Indians on reservations. The Indians would be away from possible trouble with white settlers. Instead of moving freely over the plains to hunt buffalo, the Indians would live in one place. They would receive food and money from the government.

5 0
2 years ago
What is the purpose of the Antarctic Treaty?
Kamila [148]

to define what kinds of scientific study can be done in Antarctica

7 0
3 years ago
Understanding the Case
S_A_V [24]

Answer:

Marbury: Was appointed as a federal judge - Supported the Judiciary Act of 1789 - Argued for original jurisdiction.

-Madison: Refused to honor an appointment.Explanation:

Marbury v. Madison was a judicial case resolved by the Supreme Court of the United States in 1803. It arose as a result of a political dispute following the presidential elections of 1800, in which Thomas Jefferson, who was a Democratic Republican, defeated then-President John Adams, who was a federalist. In the last days of the outgoing government of Adams, the Congress, dominated by the federalists, established a series of judicial positions, among them 42 justices the of peace for the District of Columbia. The Senate confirmed the appointments, the president signed them and the Secretary of State was in charge of sealing and delivering the appointment documents. In the last-minute hustle and bustle, the outgoing secretary of state did not deliver the minutes of appointment to four justices of the peace, including William Marbury.

The new secretary of state under President Jefferson, James Madison, refused to deliver the minutes of appointment as the new government was irritated by the maneuver of the federalists of trying to secure control of the judiciary with the appointment of members of their party just before ceasing in government. However, Marbury appealed to the Supreme Court to order Madison to deliver his record.

If the Court ruled in favor of Marbury, Madison could still refuse to deliver the record and the Supreme Court would have no way to enforce the order. If the Court ruled against Marbury, it risked submitting the judiciary to Jefferson's supporters by allowing them to deny Marbury the position he could legally claim. Chief Justice John Marshall resolved this dilemma by deciding that the Supreme Court was not empowered to settle this case. Marshall ruled that Section 13 of the Judiciary Act, which granted the Court these powers, was unconstitutional because it extended the original jurisdiction of the Court to the jurisdiction defined by the Constitution itself. Having decided not to intervene in this particular case, the Supreme Court secured its position as final arbiter of the law.

8 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • Which event from the 20th century best illustrates Alexis de Tocqueville's assertion that liberty was key to the United States'
    13·1 answer
  • What lasting impact did the anti federalists demands give us
    10·1 answer
  • Explain the purpose of the United Nations and the Universal Declaration of Human Rights. Be sure to discuss their connection to
    15·1 answer
  • Which two developments did the compromise of 1850 bring about
    9·1 answer
  • describe one has no event that took place recently and state two effects it had on the people in your area ​
    14·1 answer
  • What country provided about 1 of 4 immigrants to the U.S. between 1820 and 1840?
    9·1 answer
  • compare the lifestyles of hunter-gatherers with those of settlers of early agricultural communities. the hunter and gather era i
    7·1 answer
  • 1. The 2 Most important elements of culture are_______________
    14·2 answers
  • Quiz
    11·1 answer
  • What type of Text structure does this passage use
    5·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!