Answer:
they take 10000000000000000000000000
Explanation:
easy but hard thanks for the points
Hi there. The way this question is stated is going to need some input from you to infer what was meant by the language.
This answer would be True. Because opportunity cost means more of one and less of another in simple terms, since in an economy we cannot utilize all of our resources at one time.
But I would caution that the language is in the simplest of terms! Since a more thorough definition would be that opportunity cost is the amount lost by not taking the next-best alternative. If your teacher and lesson usually describe opportunity cost and other terms simply, then I would say to go for it and choose True.
But if your lesson seems to be strict on definitions, then maybe that isn't the best definition. I would say it is good enough though because although simple, it does encompass the whole idea.
I hope this helps!
<span>D.private property is searched only when reasonable.</span>
I think the Chinese were the most important and the Koreans were not as important.
One of the main justifications to use the atomic bomb against Japan during World War II was "<span>a. To intimidate the Soviets", although a far greatest reason was to force the Japanese to surrender. </span>
