1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Studentka2010 [4]
3 years ago
10

Compare and contrast the roles played King Henry VIII and Queen Elizabeth in establishing the Church of England.

History
1 answer:
Ad libitum [116K]3 years ago
8 0

Before King Henry VIII established the Church of England, the country had been purely Catholic. But when he wanted to divorce Catherine of Aragon, his wife, the Pope didn't allow it. Divorce was absolutely prohibited. The King wanted an annulment of the marriage because his wife couldn't give him a male son.  He asked the Pope for a divorce several times but it wasn't granted. Until he and his ministers found the solution in establishing the Protestant Church of England, which was absolutely independent of the Papacy. Protestants didn't like the Pope, so Henry was free to manage the Church as he desired. Henry made himself "Head of the Church of England" and was free to marry Ann Boleyn. As the head of the Church , he was in charge of the Archbishops, Bishops and all the clergy that the English Church still retained.

The change of religion in England had enormous repercussions for the country. Monasteries and convents were all closed. His ministers declared that monks, nuns and friars were living immoral lives rather than godly lives.  They used to live lives of luxury rather than humility, while the rest of common people lived poor lives.

As regards Queen Elizabeth, when she became Queen in 1558, it was said that she would  restore the Protestant faith in England. The persecution to Protestants during the reign of her half-sister Queen Mary had done much damage to the country. Elizabeth's religious points of view were surprisingly tolerant for the age in which she lived. She had her own convictions and beliefs and respected other people's views.

During her reign , her main priority was to bring peace and stability to her people. She only adopted strict measures against Catholics when Catholic extremists threatened her government.

Unfortunately for the Queen, many of her contemporaries didn't share her views on toleration and she was forced to be harsher towards Catholics than she wanted.  She wanted her Church to appeal to both Catholics and Protestants. She had little sympathy with extremists of both religions. She hoped that by keeping the church as it was, her people would slowly become accustom to it. She wanted Catholicism to die naturally as people turned to the religion she had established. By the year of her death, 1603, the English people were generally Protestant and Catholics were the minority.

You might be interested in
Natural law in a sentence
nirvana33 [79]
Humans need to eat and drink in order to survive, therefore it against natural law to deprive oneself of food and water, as natural law says that species must survive.
3 0
3 years ago
After the civil war atlanta became the center of _______ in the southern united states
Vilka [71]

Answer:

transportation

Explanation:

5 0
3 years ago
PLS HELP I REALLY NEED ANSWERS IM ON A TIME LIMIT How did imperialism affect colonized people in India?
Aleks [24]

Answer: I'm almost 100% sure that the 2nd one is correct, but I would wait for another opinion as well.

Explanation:

6 0
2 years ago
How did the Portuguese strategy of building forts instead of permanent colonies affect Portugal's history in Africa ?
JulsSmile [24]
Well, it allowed them to garrison more troops there which led to an increase in slave commerce for the portugesse traders. 
6 0
2 years ago
Identify important features of the fourth, fifth, and sixth amendments.
Sliva [168]
The 4th Amendment states that people shall not be subject to unreasonable searches and seizures, and no unreasonable warrants shall be issued for unreasonable searches and seizures without a good reason.
The 5th Amendment states that everyone has a right to a trial by jury, and that nobody shall be tried for the same crime more than once.  It also prevents people from being forced to provide evidence that could be used to incriminate their own self. Finally, people's property or life or freedom cannot be taken away without due process of law, and private property that has been seized for public use will warrant  just compensation.
The 6th Amendment states that every person has a right to a speedy and public trial, as well as the right to be confronted with the witnesses against their self, a right to an attorney in their case, and a right to know the charges they are being tried for.
I highlighted the important parts. 
7 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • This candidate for the presidency who felt cheated in the election of 1824 was portrayed as “ a man of the people”, he organized
    11·1 answer
  • How Pericles both helped and hurt Greece?
    15·1 answer
  • What does “rolled hat” mean in military slang?
    9·1 answer
  • How did great Britain react to the rise of fascism before WW2
    8·1 answer
  • Why would a Seminole not like the United States honoring the memory of Andrew
    15·1 answer
  • PLEASE HELP What legislation created by FDR became the New Deal’s most popular and long-lasting program?
    14·2 answers
  • Why did the Southern states believe they had the right to secede from the
    9·2 answers
  • Which co-editor of the boston guardian, and first black man accepted to phi beta kappa, launched a public campaign in 1901 to op
    15·1 answer
  • What is the result of the public and government demand for increased accountability from schools
    12·1 answer
  • Who is the destroyer God?
    9·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!