Answer:
Product warrant liability to be reported as on 31.12.2021* is $3.124
<em>*The procedures are attached in a microsof excel document. </em>
Explanation:
This amount will be recognized as a liability only if product warranty amount can be rmeasured reliabily and there is probability that there will be an outflow of funds.
Answer:
1-a.
in order to determine the present value of option a we can look for the PVIFA (annuity factor) for 24% / 12 = 2% monthly rate and 25 payments.
PVIFA = 19.523
Present value of the 25 payments = $540 x 19.523 = $10,542.42
+
Present value of final payment = $10,000 / (1 + 24%)²⁵/¹² = $6,388.10
PV = $16,930.52
Present value of option b = $16,638
1-b.
- b. option b (lower present value)
Answer:
$577.5 favorable
Explanation:
Data provided in the question:
Standard quantity per unit 3 lbs
Standard price per pound = $2.75
Actual pounds used = 15,000 lbs
Actual price per pound = $2.90
Number of units produced = 5,070
Now,
The direct materials quantity variance is given as;
= | ( Actual quantity - Standard quantity ) | × Standard price
= ( 15,000 lbs - {Standard quantity per unit × units produced}) × $2.75
= ( 15,000 lbs - { 3 × 5,070}) × $2.75
= | ( 15,000 lbs - 15,210 ) | × $2.75
= $577.5
Since,
Standard quantity is higher than the actual quantity
thus,
$577.5 favorable
Answer:
It is an example of the shoes leather costs.
Explanation:
Shoe leather cost is the cost which involve the time as well as the efforts which people spend on trying to counter-act the inflation effects like holding less amount of cash and make additional trips to the bank.
In this scenario, Alyssa in order to protect herself from the effect of the inflation, she sends employee to bank for depositing the money into the bank four times a day. Therefore, it is an example of Shoe leather cost
Answer:
a. Whataburger is not using the optimal cost-minimizaing mix of cashier and kiosks.
b. Whataburger should hire more cashier and rent fewer kiosks in order to improve its mix of inputs and minimize the cost
Explanation:
a. According to the given data we have the following:
Let "C" is a cashier.
"K" is a kiosk
MPC = 48 (Marginal Product of Cashier)
MPK = 32 (Marginal Product of Kiosk)
PC = $15 (cashier can be hired for a wage of $15)
PK = $12 (Kiosk rents for $12)
At optimal cost minimization point, (MPC / MPK) = (PC / PK)
(MPC / PC) = (MPK / PK)
(MPC / PC) = (48 / 15) = 3.2
(MPK / PK) = (32 / 12) = 2.67
Since the (MPC / PC) and (MPK / PK) is not equal. It implies Whataburger is not using the optimal cost-minimizaing mix of cashier and kiosks.
b. We have to use the following:
(MPC / PC) > (MPK / PK)
i.e., 3.2 > 2.67
It means Whataburger hire more cashier and rent fewer kiosks in order to improve its mix of inputs and minimize the cost.
