Answer:
Following is attached the solution to each part of the given question.
I hope it will help you a lot!
Explanation:
Answer:
"Why We've Been Hugely Underestimating the Overfishing of the Oceans"
Determining whether each statement is true or false:
a. False
b. True
c. False
d. True
Explanation:
The article "Why We've Been Hugely Underestimating the Overfishing of the Oceans," was published by the Washington Post on January 19, 2016. It was written by Chelsea Harvey. It tried to show how the world fish stock had been declining due to overfishing. This is why it provided a report contrary to the FAO report.
While the FAO report noted that the peak of worldwide catches was at 86 million tons in 1996, the contrary and independent report, using "catch reconstruction" showed that the peak was at 130 million tons in 1996. The reconstructed research also showed that worldwide fish catches had suffered declines ever since the 1996 peak, thereby threatening "world food security and marine ecosystems". The contrary report also suggested that all stakeholders must collaborate so that fish stocks can rebuild naturally.
I believe that this problem has the
following choices:
> a debit of $2,500 to
Merchandise Inventory.
> a credit of $2,500 to Sales.
> a debit of $1,900 to
Merchandise Inventory.
> a credit of $1,900 to Cost of
Goods Sold.
The correct answer from the choices
is:
<span>> a credit of $2,500 to Sales
</span>
<span> </span>
When evaluating a supplier using the integrated supplier scorecard, most are reevaluated on quality of their products, cost of the product, how quickly the items are able to be deviled and the flexibility the supplier has when the organization needs supplies. The scorecards allow the company to make sure they are doing and receiving the best items from their suppliers on each different level.
