Answer:
agriculture
Explanation:
because they study plants/geology
Answer:
Dr Right of use asset 59,007.60
Cr Lease liability 59,007.60
Explanation:
Variable lease payments are generally not included as right of use asset or lease liability. Even though a 60% possibility exists that an additional $5,000 will be paid, they are not based on an index and are not disguised payments (only two exceptions to this rule).
Annual lease payments = $12,000
PV annuity factor, 6%, 6 periods = 4.9173
PV of lease payments = $12,000 x 4.9173 = $59,007.60
Answer:
b. 7.28%
Explanation:
This question is asking for the yield to maturity(YTM) of the bond. You can solve this using a financial calculator with the inputs below. Additionally, adjust the coupon payment(PMT) and time to maturity(N) to semiannual basis.
Time to maturity; N = 5*2 = 10
Face value; FV = 1000
Price of bond; PV = -1071
Semiannual coupon payment; PMT = (9%/2) *1000 = 45
then compute semiannual interest rate; CPT I/Y = 3.64%
Next, convert the semiannual rate to annual rate(YTM) = 3.64% *2
YTM = 7.28%
The main thing which superior performance allows a firm to do is:
- reinvest some of its profits in gaining more resources and thus grow.
<h3>What is Business Strategy?</h3>
This refers to the creation and maintenance of competitive advantage of a particular market against other competitors which gives a particular business an edge in the market.
With this n mind, we are told that successful business strategies generate value and then if they are able to leverage on this, then they can reinvest the profits.
Read more about business strategies here:
brainly.com/question/25686320
Answer:
C) performance of the contract is commercially impracticable.
Explanation:
Contract law contemplates certain situations where performing the contract is either difficult or impossible and therefore the party is not liable for breaching the contract.
Commercial impracticability applies to contracts where the performance of at least one party is impracticable and cannot be accomplished.
In this case, Quinn cannot perform his duty since the price of scrap steel increased beyond any reasonable price contemplated in the contract. Since Quinn is not responsible for setting the price of scrap steel, he is not liable for breaching the contract.
