I think the appropriate response is no. It was misguided and shortsighted.Both Britain and France were less needy financially on exchange with the US than Jefferson envisioned, however then financial matters never was his solid suit.
The War of 1812 was more to do with the possibility that Britain, its assets secured in the long haul battle against Napoleon, would be not able make any successful guard of Canada which could in this manner effectively be conquered.However, Britain had since a long time ago settled maritime amazingness over France and was along these lines ready to utilize its naval force to disable the US economy and power Madison into an arranged peace.
The Tenth Amendment upholds both federalism and the state's rights. It identifies the rights of the people (state rights) not only of government power to the people. The bill of rights is implemented in the US, which means it extends to all the states. The US Constitution applies the law to all its jurisdiction which is all the states.
The Hans dynasty retains centralized burueacracy and unified political system of the Quin but adopts and grafts upon this the Confucian view that government should be run by educated, ethnical men.
Answer: D. Salt
Explanation:
Zone 2 has a large amount of ocean in it and ocean water is salty which means that it can be harnessed to produce salt. Zone 2 therefore was most probably a major producer of salt.
This goes hand in hand with actual statistics today because a major country in Zone 2 is India and they are currently the world's third largest salt producers.
Answer:
This borrowing may have a negative impact by crowding out private investment.
Explanation:
When the government goest into deficit spending to stimulate the economy in times when the economy is slowing down, what happens is that the government now demands more loanable funds: it demands a higher proportion of the savings in the economy in the form of government bonds.
This higher government demand for loanable funds crowds out private investment for two reasons:
- It raises the interest rate, making private investment more expensive.
- It reduces the amount of loanable funds available for the private sector (because it takes over a larger share of them).
