Assuming that this is referring to the same list of options that was posted before with this question, <span>the correct response would be that "</span>the federal government stopped accepting paper money for the purchase of land," since this greatly reduced confidence in the government.
Answer:
The city was a magnet for European immigrants—at first Germans, Irish and Scandinavians, then from the 1890s to 1914, Jews, Czechs, Poles and Italians.
Explanation:
While many Americans know that they have a right to free speech, the lay opinion often views the degree of protection afforded by the United State Constitution as much broader than it is in reality. The First Amendment does not protect all types of speech.
The First Amendment states that “Congress shall make no law . . . abridging the freedom of speech.” While it states “Congress,” the protections are also against state government and local public officials from making any law that abridges a person’s freedom of speech. However, simply because the government cannot make a law of this nature does not mean that individuals are free to say anything that they want to. For example, employers may prohibit certain types of speech that would not violate a person’s First Amendment rights if the employer was not a public employer.
So I believe the answers would either be B or C (:
Thanks me and mark as brainliest (:
Neolitihic revolution refers to the revolution that transform mankind's lifestyle from hunting/gathering into agricultural.
In an agricultural society, each member need to coordinate with one another in order to determine land's ownership and trading regulations.
Because of this, a mediator such as government is needed in order to make everything fair.
