On one hand it does, but on the other, it doesn't.
If you look at the movie from a historical perspective, we can see what people might have behaved like in the actual event when Titanic sank. The movie portrays their thoughts, emotions, and behaviors during that horrible night, so if you think about it that way, I guess we can understand the event more. On the other hand though, the movie included a love story which is not really relevant to what actually happened in history, so it doesn't really help the viewer think about history much.
Available options are:
A. direct channel.
B. indirect channel.
C. facilitated channel.
D. customer-service channel.
E. truck jobber channel.
Answer:
A. Direct channel.
Explanation:
The use of direct channel is prominent in the ice-cream industry which sales its products by using a music which triggers the sense that the ice-cream is just at my next step and the products at offers are from low cost to high cost to make maximum sales. The type of channel in which the salesmen sell their product by moving door to door is often refferred to as Direct channel.
Answer: The correct answer is " a. $92,000.".
Explanation: The explicit costs are observable, that is, those that we can easily take into account and decrease our operating result (salaries paid to employees, material costs, taxes, etc.)
So her total explicit cost were: $12 000 + $65 000 + $15 000 = $92 000.
Answer:
Answer of each requirement is given seperatly below.
a What is the value of Siebel using the DCF method?
Value under DCF = CF * (1+growth rate)/ (WAAC" -Growth rate)
Putting values (assuming after tax earning is all in cash)
Value of SI = 25 (1+6%)/ 20%-6% = 189 million dollars
"WAAC calculation
Here WAAC is equal to cost of equity (ke) as company is debt free.
so
Ke = risk free rate + beta (risk premium)
= 5 + 2.5 (6) = 20%
b What is the value using the comparable recent transactions method?
Based on recent tansaction the value of siebel incorporated will be calculated as shown below
Value of SI = Profit afte * 10 = 25 * 10 = 250 million dollars
Publicly-traded Rand Technology, a direct competitor of Siebel's sale is taken as bench mark.
c What would be the value of the firm if we combine the results of both methods?
By combining value of both value technique we get 189 + 250 = 439 million dollars.
C) Studied
nonobservance
<span>
A face-saving technique in which all parties
involved in an embarrassing situation ignore it and continue their conversation
or interaction as though the embarrassing situation never happened is referred
to as studied nonobservance. In this case, studied nonobservance is the act of
diminishing or undermining a set of faulty, distressing or embarrassing behaviors
or actions. Includes the flaws, lack of awareness and defects are ceased to
keep the person or individual “on the move” as not to ruin the ego or the self. </span>
