5) The relation between intensity and current appears linear for intensity of 300 or more (current = intensity/10). For intensity of 150, current is less than that linear relation would predict. This seems to support the notion that current will go to zero for zero intensity. Current might even be negative for zero intensity since the line through the points (300, 30) and (150, 10) will have a negative intercept (-10) when current is zero.
Usually, we expect no output from a power-translating device when there is no input, so we expect current = 0 when intensity = 0.
6) We have no reason to believe the linear relation will not continue to hold for values of intensity near those already shown. We expect the current to be 100 for in intensity of 1000.
8) Apparently, times were only measured for 1, 3, 6, 8, and 12 laps. The author of the graph did not want to extrapolate beyond the data collected--a reasonable choice.
Answer:CASE #1 - Divergent and convergent one-way
residential streets to reduce direct through
routes impacting the neighborhood.
CASE #2 - Alternating one-way streets throughout a
portion of a grid system to gain safety
advantages of one-way operations.
CASE #3 - Creating a one-way couplet by paring a
residential street with a nearby thru street to
create a corridor for thru traffic
Step-by-step explanation:
The value of 8 in 56982 is in the tens place value. The value of 8 in 156,408 is in the ones value
Divide
80/8 = 10
The value of 8 in 56,982 is 10 times as large as the value in 8 in 156,408
hope this helps
3.1 , 3.4 , 11 would be your answer's
