It is very difficult to write a constitution that all states would approve because all states want to make there own rule
Historic revisionism includes revisiting the sources of a historic document or length with a unique attitude or new information that would adjust how we see it.
<h3>
What is Historical revisionism?</h3>
Historical revisionism is the method via way of means of which the ancient record, the records of the society, as understood in its collective memory, constantly accounts for new information and interpretations of the activities which might be usually understood as records.
This manner of revisiting records has both advantageous and negative aspects.
Hence, Historic revisionism includes revisiting the sources of a historic document or length with a unique attitude or new information that would adjust how we see it.
learn more about Historic revisionism here:
brainly.com/question/8862527
#SPJ1
Answer:D. a demander of funds in the financial market.
Explanation:
The money of a state usual comes from the people through taxes , everything one buys in most countries is taxed and the tax money goes to the government who use it as a state money .
This money is sometimes used for people who receive government allowances.
Some money is used to finance certain projects and operations .
This makes governments to be typically net demanders of funds.They usually borrow way more than they save and sometimes it even get misused due to mismanagement.
Answer:
Cotton has the largest per-acre energy costs of all agricultural commodities and so so changes in the price of oil can also directly affect the price of cotton. ... In addition changes in crude oil prices affect the price of polyester, a substitute to cotton in the manufacture of textiles.
Explanation:
Hope it helps
Answer:
Reducing trade barriers
Explanation:
<u>If governments choose protectionism, they harm citizens who could benefit from the products, services or jobs offered by foreign companies.</u>
If, for example, the “A” government sets <em>tariffs to protect the domestic market</em>, the “B” government <em>could respond with tariffs in retaliation</em>, which would result in both countries being harmed. So, the problem of trade warfare is still represented by a “Prisoner's Dilemma” game because it says that two people, in this case, two governments, can decide not to cooperate even if it goes against the interest of both.
On the other hand, <em>unrestricted free trade could go against governments that develop trade policies based on national economic well-being.</em>
The game's equilibrium solution would be for both countries to opt to reduce their trade barriers through negotiations.
