<span>Uprisings such as Shays' Rebellion highlighted the weakness of the "Articles of Confederation," since it became clear that the Articles did not give the central (federal) government enough power. </span>
The Pullman Strike demonstrated the power of the labor movement by involving 250,000 railroad workers on 20 railroads.
<h3>What was one outcome of the Pullman strike in 1894?</h3>
The companies obtained a court injunction against the strikers, and the strike was defeated when the American Federation of Labor ordered its members to return to work. A search for a more peaceful method to settle labor disputes among railroad workers was one of the outcomes.
<h3>What occurred in the Pullman strike of 1894?</h3>
On May 11, 1894, Pullman employees went on strike in protest. Pullman workers would receive assistance if the American Railway Union agreed. The rail network was disrupted as a result of switchmen who were members of the ARU refusing to handle Pullman cars. The nation's railroad workers went on numerous strikes as a result of this initial boycott.
To learn more about Pullman Strike here
brainly.com/question/7223166
#SPJ4
Answer:
First put up blockades, then later built a wall, to stop the migration of the people.
Explanation:
I know
Correct answer:
<h2>Limited government</h2>
The 10th Amendment puts limits on the powers of the federal government. It reserves powers for the states (and for the people themselves) any powers not specifically designated to the federal government in the United States Constitution. Any laws and powers exercised by the states still must be in accord with what is stated in the US Constitution, however.
For some historical context, we might also consider that the original framers of the US Constitution thoughts that statements such as the 10th Amendment -- and all of the first 10 Amendments, known as the Bill of Rights -- were already inherent in the Constitution as it was written. They had composed a constitution that intentionally placed limits on the federal government. So, stating such a limit in an amendment seemed like a repetition of what was already apparent in the Constitution itself. As noted by the National Constitution Center, "The Constitution’s Framers thought that a bill of rights was appropriate for an unlimited government, but not for a limited one like the national government created by the Constitution. The Constitution accordingly sought to secure liberty through enumerations of powers to the government rather than through enumerations of rights to the people."
Nevertheless, to assure those who wanted the rights of the people specifically listed and protected, Amendments 1 through 10 were added to the Constitution as a Bill of Rights to affirm those protections.
