1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Lisa [10]
3 years ago
8

PLS HELP WILL GIVE BRAINLIEST ASAP

Social Studies
2 answers:
OLEGan [10]3 years ago
8 0

i think the answer is D. Spain left the European Union.

hope this helps

klio [65]3 years ago
6 0
The answer is D that Spain left the European Union. Really hopes this helps you:)
You might be interested in
How to solve superstition ​
Masja [62]

Superstition is a belief or notion, not based on reasons or knowledge, in or of the ominous significance of a particular thing, circumstance, occurring, proceeding, or the like. To overcome superstition, figure out reality and cling to it. Reality is what the five senses—touch, sight, sound, smell, and taste—allow us to perceive. It is not reality if none of those can comprehend it. Remember that there are restrictions at this time. One cannot quickly grasp the distant past. For instance, I reject the existence of gods or invisible, immaterial entities since there is no proof for them. However, since fossilized dinosaur bones have been discovered all throughout the world, I assume that they actually existed. In other words, there is proof that they formerly existed.

4 0
2 years ago
Read 2 more answers
A factory increases wages for its workers but does not have enough money left over to invest in new machinery. This is an exampl
Keith_Richards [23]

Answer:

A. Opportunity costs

Explanation:

I got this as a correct answer on APEX plus according to my notes, it makes sense

6 0
3 years ago
Write about the Pros of Indian Judiciary system (for a debate)? (urgent pls)
BartSMP [9]

Answer:

The collegium system must not see itself as being above the safeguards and measures for transparency, accountability and demographic representation that apply to India’s pillars of democracy.

In September 2019, Chief Justice of Madras High Court Vijaya Kamlesh Tahilramani resigned after the collegium upheld their decision to transfer her to the high court of Meghalaya (one of the smallest in the country). Justice Tahilramani was the senior-most high-court judge in the country. The members of the bar associations across Tamil Nadu protested against this move and carried “a one-day court boycott.” In addition, in Maharashtra's Latur, about 2,000 lawyers boycotted court proceedings to protest the transfer. The collegium responded by saying that they have “cogent reasons” for the transfer, and will reveal them if required.

At the heart of this controversy is the functioning of the collegium system, which makes decisions about appointments and transfers in the higher judiciary. In February 2020, former Supreme Court judge and member of the collegium from 2018–2019, Arjan Kumar Sikri, said that far from a “scientific study” about candidates, “most times, we [the collegium] go by “our impression” when appointing judges [to high courts and the Supreme Court].”

The collegium system is headed by the Chief Justice of India (CJI) and four senior-most judges of the Supreme Court. India’s Constitution originally stipulated that the judges of the Supreme Court and high courts would be appointed by the President based on a process of “consultation” with senior judges. The present collegium system emerged later based on three key rulings. In 1981, the “First Judges Case” ruled that the process of consultation with the CJI and other judges did not require a consensus about recommendations. Essentially, the ruling gave the central government “primacy in judicial appointments.” In 1993, the “Second Judges Case” overturned this decision and introduced the collegium system, arguing that “consultation” required “concurrence.” Specifically, the ruling said that the process of appointing judges would be based on “an institutional opinion formed in consultation with the two senior-most judges in the Supreme Court” and the CJI. In 1998, the “Third Judges Case” ruled that the collegium would be a five-member body, establishing the system that is most similar to the one currently being followed.

This reading list details how the current system can be reformed.

Opaque and Unaccountable System

C Raj Kumar writes that the lack of information about the appointment of judges, including the criteria based on which the judges make their choice, is “the most persuasive criticism of the collegium system.”

   Without a transparent process of the appointment of judges, the collegium system will not have the credibility and the legitimacy for it to be accepted by all stakeholders within the legal system. Transparency will not be established merely by stating that the members of the collegium will act in a transparent manner. It will have to be demonstrated by the process that the judiciary adopts in the selection of judges.

The lack of transparency and the absence of formal criteria have multiple worrying implications. Presently, there is no structured process to investigate if a judge who is recommended by the collegium has any conflict of interests. This is important in the context where the

   … collegium has been fraught with serious allegations of different types of alleged conflict of interest among the members of the collegium and the individuals they have selected to become judges of the High Courts and the Supreme Court. There is an urgent need for the collegium to formulate a detailed set of rules and regulations that will govern the determination of conflict of interest among the members of the collegium who are involved in the selection of judges.

Social Background of Judges  

Alok Prasanna Kumar identifies that the collegium system prefers practising lawyers rather than appointing and promoting “judges of the subordinate judiciary,” which often comprises a diverse pool of candidates.

7 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
_______ reinforcement is a reward for a constructive action. positive alternative egalitarian negative temporary
SOVA2 [1]
Positive <span>reinforcement is a reward for a constructive action.

Have a good one!</span>
4 0
3 years ago
Why was Crozat’s proprietorship a failure ?
Anton [14]

Answer:

Louisiana colonist were not interested in farming. Trading with the Indians was a failure because the British paid more for the furs and sold European goods to the Indians cheaper than the Louisiana colonist could. Crozat failed to make a profit from the colony. He never sent enough supplies.

Explanation:

Hoped I helped

7 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • I need help edmedally
    11·2 answers
  • The European Union is attempting to develop a national identity by creating cultural symbols such as A. a national holiday B. an
    13·1 answer
  • How is declaring war differ from military action
    7·2 answers
  • What might be one reason an immigrant would move to the united states
    6·2 answers
  • Which of the following is an example of a wicked problem? Group of answer choices a) A community attempting to prevent terrorism
    11·1 answer
  • Can someone answer this, please?
    15·1 answer
  • Which Supreme Court procedure involves justices discussing a case,
    9·1 answer
  • Describe the type of gold used for trade in Ghana.
    7·2 answers
  • Where were the 2018 Asian Games held?
    11·1 answer
  • Why this constitutions is called a<br> federal democratic republic constitution​
    13·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!