Answer:
World-systems theory (also known as world-systems analysis or the world-systems perspective)[1] is a multidisciplinary approach to world history and social change which emphasizes the world-system (and not nation states) as the primary (but not exclusive) unit of social analysis.[1] "World-system" refers to the inter-regional and transnational division of labor, which divides the world into core countries, semi-periphery countries, and the periphery countries.[2] Core countries focus on higher skill, capital-intensive production, and the rest of the world focuses on low-skill, labor-intensive production and extraction of raw materials.[3] This constantly reinforces the dominance of the core countries.[3] Nonetheless, the system has dynamic characteristics, in part as a result of revolutions in transport technology, and individual states can gain or lose their core (semi-periphery, periphery) status over time.[3] This structure is unified by the division of labour. It is a world-economy rooted in a capitalist economy.[4] For a time, certain countries become the world hegemon; during the last few centuries, as the world-system has extended geographically and intensified economically, this status has passed from the Netherlands, to the United Kingdom and (most recently) to the United States.[3]A world map of countries by their supposed trading status in 2000, using the world system differentiation into core countries (blue), semi-periphery countries (purple) and periphery countries (red). Based on the list in Dunn, Kawana, Brewer.
World-systems theory has been examined by many political theorists and sociologists to explain the reasons for the rise and fall of states, income inequality, social unrest, and imperialism.
Trust me mark me as brainliest trust me
Answer:
Holding a lottery to give away Cherokee land
Explanation:
Answer:
This made double-cropping possible in some areas, and in some places, even triple-cropping became possible ... the hardiness and productivity of various varieties of rice were and are in large part responsible for the density of population in South, Southeast, and East Asia.
According to a different source, the movement that the question refers to is Black Lives Matter.
Black Lives Matter is a movement that originated in the African-American community, and which campaigns against violence towards black people, particularly from the state and in the criminal justice system.
This movement is similar to PanAfricanism in that both of them have a focus on race. Moreover, both of these movements see a connection between all people of color, and share a desire to bring them together. However, PanAfricanism does not oppose or criticize the government of any one state. Moreover, it addresses Black people everywhere (with emphasis in Africa), not just those in the United States.
Black consciousness, on the other hand, is similar to Black Lives Matter in that both movements were grassroots movements, and they both addressed the subject of police brutality and institutional racism. However, Black Consciousness focused on the South African apartheid, while Black Lives Matter focuses on the United States.
<span>A specific time during development when a particular event has its greatest consequences and the presence of certain kinds of environmental stimuli is necessary for development to proceed normally is called disi</span>
